Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Douglas Dynamics Inc (PLOW)

247 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in PLOW. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Fetching live quote...
Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↑ +20
Streak
5Q ▲
Buyers last Q
58%

Smart Money Signals — PLOW

Based on 250 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 5 quarters in a row

last 6Q
For 5 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added PLOW than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️

At the ownership peak (100% of max)

100% of all-time peak
250 hedge funds hold PLOW right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
🚀

Fast accumulation — +54% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
+88 new funds entered over the past year (+54% YoY). That's a rapid rush of institutional money. Fast accumulation often signals a major thesis — but it also means the stock could fall quickly if that thesis breaks.
🟡

Slight buying edge — 58% buying

147 buying105 selling
Last quarter: 147 funds bought or added vs 105 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.
➡️

Steady new buyers — ~50 new funds per quarter

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 45 → 34 → 48 → 50. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒

52% of holders stayed for 2+ years

■ 52% conviction (2yr+) ■ 25% medium ■ 23% new
129 out of 250 hedge funds have held PLOW for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💰

Value +34% but shares only +7% — price-driven

Value
+33%
Shares
+7%
Last quarter: the total dollar value of institutional holdings rose +34%, but actual share count only changed +7%. The gap is explained by the stock's price rising — not new buying. Strong value growth with weak share growth means the rally is price momentum, not fresh institutional demand.
📈

Growing discovery — still being found

32 → 45 → 34 → 48 → 50 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 45 → 34 → 48 → 50. A growing number of institutions are discovering PLOW each quarter. The narrative is still spreading — leaving room for ongoing capital accumulation.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 59% veterans vs 28% newcomers

■ 59% veterans ■ 13% 1-2yr ■ 28% new
Entry-cohort mix of 251 holders: 148 (59%) are 2+ year veterans, 32 entered 1–2 years ago, and 71 (28%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
✅

Strong quality — 39% AUM from major funds

39% from top-100 AUM funds
50 of 250 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, accounting for 39% of total institutional value held. A meaningful share of the ownership value comes from the most well-resourced institutions.
4.2
out of 10
Moderate Exit Risk
Exit risk score 4.2/10 — some crowding factors present, but no critical concentration. Watch ownership trend over the next 1–2 quarters for direction.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — PLOW

In 2026 Q2, 147 hedge funds were net buyers of PLOW (50 opened a new position, 97 added to an existing one), while 105 reduced or exited (75 trimmed, 30 sold completely) — a 58% buyer ratio, indicating a slight buying edge. This marks 5 consecutive quarters of net institutional buying — a persistent conviction signal. 39% of total institutional value in PLOW is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting strong institutional quality. Net fund flow last quarter: +20 funds (more new holders than closures). Total institutional holders: 250.

Hedge Fund Ownership: PLOW

How many hedge funds hold PLOW — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of PLOW vs. share price

Market Analysis: PLOW

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: PLOW

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

14 top-rated funds 0 high-conviction
Consensus
5.1
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
1.1
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: PLOW
2026 Q3 Stats Unlock in 14 days 247 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in PLOW. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q2) Prior (2026 Q1) Change
Funds Holding 247 230 7.39%
13F Shares 22M 22M 0.82%
Total Value $1.11B $847M 30.75%
New Positions 49 48 +1
Increased Positions 95 86 +9
Closed Positions 32 23 +9
Reduced Positions 75 64 +11
Total Calls 1 2 -50.0%
Total Puts 0 0 -
PUT/CALL Ratio 0.0 0.0 Bullish

Statistics: PLOW

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

247 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in PLOW. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 PLOW holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Ararat Capital Management LP 7.06% 279,440 $15.1M
2 Icon Advisers Inc/Co 2.34% 230,100 $12.4M
3 Alta Fox Capital Management, LLC 2.09% 192,342 $10.4M
4 Punch & Associates Investment Management, INC. 1.76% 659,319 $35.6M
5 1492 Capital Management LLC 1.25% 78,593 $4.2M
6 Semanteon Capital Management, LP 1.13% 4,641 $250K
7 Nicholas Wealth, LLC. 0.88% 29,600 $1.6M
8 Wilson Asset Management (international) Pty Ltd 0.84% 56,632 $3.1M
9 Sovereign's Capital Management, LLC 0.71% 19,851 $1.1M
10 Globeflex Capital L P 0.60% 86,594 $4.7M
11 Virtus Advisers, LLC 0.52% 25,198 $1.4M
12 Ranger Investment Management, L.P. 0.37% 109,622 $5.9M
13 Systematic Financial Management LP 0.34% 315,094 $17.0M
14 Pacific Ridge Capital Partners, LLC 0.31% 31,437 $1.7M
15 Dean Capital Management 0.29% 14,593 $787K
16 Algert Global LLC 0.28% 436,861 $23.6M
17 Hillsdale Investment Management Inc. 0.26% 212,310 $11.5M
18 Integrated Quantitative Investments LLC 0.25% 28,539 $1.5M
19 Df Dent & Co Inc 0.25% 246,319 $13.3M
20 Pzena Investment Management LLC 0.22% 1,384,680 $74.7M
21 Silvercrest Asset Management Group LLC 0.21% 599,147 $32.3M
22 Kings Path Partners LLC 0.18% 16,031 $501K
23 Lakewood Asset Management LLC 0.16% 5,387 $291K
24 Dean Investment Associates, LLC 0.14% 20,118 $1.1M
25 Seizert Capital Partners, LLC 0.14% 62,638 $3.4M
Investor Ownership
History
% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Douglas Dynamics Inc (PLOW)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for PLOW?

Buying streak — 5 quarters in a row: For 5 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added PLOW than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for PLOW?

Slight buying edge — 58% buying: Last quarter: 147 funds bought or added vs 105 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.

What is the fund quality score for PLOW holders?

Strong quality — 39% AUM from major funds: 50 of 250 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, accounting for 39% of total institutional value held. A meaningful share of the ownership value comes from the most well-resourced institutions.

How long have hedge funds held PLOW?

52% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 129 out of 250 hedge funds have held PLOW for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →