Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Pinterest Inc (PINS)

662 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in PINS. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Fetching live quote...
Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↓ -39
Streak
4Q ▼
Buyers last Q
42%

Smart Money Signals — PINS

Based on 676 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly

📉

Selling streak — 4 quarters in a row

last 6Q
For 4 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds reduced or closed their PINS positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
📊

High ownership — 80% of 3.0Y peak

80% of all-time peak
676 funds currently hold this stock — 80% of the 3.0-year high of 850 funds (reached 2025 Q2). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
📉

Outflows — 20% fewer funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
174 fewer hedge funds hold PINS compared to a year ago (-20% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🟠

More sellers than buyers — 42% buying

325 buying441 selling
Last quarter: 441 funds reduced or exited vs 325 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.
⚠️

Fewer new buyers each quarter (-6 vs last Q)

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 134 → 157 → 124 → 118. Each quarter fewer new institutions are entering. This usually means most funds that wanted in are already in — the stock is well-known but the pool of potential new buyers is shrinking.
🔒

59% of holders stayed for 2+ years

■ 59% conviction (2yr+) ■ 20% medium ■ 20% new
401 out of 676 hedge funds have held PINS for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💰

Price up while funds trimmed (+11% value, -4% shares)

Value
+11%
Shares
-4%
Last quarter: total value of institutional PINS holdings rose +11% even though funds reduced share count by 4%. The stock price increased enough to offset the selling. Institutions are quietly trimming into price strength — watch for rotation.
📊

Peak discovery — momentum slowing

170 → 134 → 157 → 124 → 118 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 134 → 157 → 124 → 118. PINS is well-known in the hedge fund world, but fresh entries are gradually declining. The explosive phase of institutional discovery is likely behind us.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 66% veterans vs 24% newcomers

■ 66% veterans ■ 11% 1-2yr ■ 24% new
Entry-cohort mix of 725 holders: 476 (66%) are 2+ year veterans, 78 entered 1–2 years ago, and 171 (24%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆

Elite ownership — 60% AUM from top-100 funds

60% from top-100 AUM funds
61 of 670 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 60% of total institutional value in PINS. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
2.9
out of 10
Low Exit Risk
Exit risk score 2.9/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — PINS

In 2026 Q2, 325 hedge funds were net buyers of PINS (118 opened a new position, 207 added to an existing one), while 441 reduced or exited (284 trimmed, 157 sold completely) — a 42% buyer ratio, indicating roughly balanced activity. This extends a 4-quarter selling streak, suggesting sustained institutional caution. 60% of total institutional value in PINS is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting elite-tier ownership quality. Net fund flow last quarter: -39 funds (more exits than new entries). Total institutional holders: 676.

Hedge Fund Ownership: PINS

How many hedge funds hold PINS — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of PINS vs. share price

Market Analysis: PINS

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: PINS

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

34 top-rated funds 4 high-conviction
Consensus
6.7
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
3.3
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: PINS
662 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in PINS. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q2) Prior (2026 Q1) Change
Funds Holding 662 715 -7.41%
13F Shares 539M 576M -6.46%
Total Value $11.12B $10.48B 6.07%
New Positions 115 124 -9
Increased Positions 190 234 -44
Closed Positions 162 223 -61
Reduced Positions 270 251 +19
Total Calls 29 31 -6.45%
Total Puts 26 25 4.0%
PUT/CALL Ratio 0.9 0.81 Neutral

Statistics: PINS

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

662 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in PINS. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 PINS holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Long Walk Management LP 6.68% 1,400,000 $29.4M
2 Boothe Investment Group, Inc. 4.59% 692,251 $14.6M
3 One Fin Capital Management LP 4.01% 590,000 $12.4M
4 Shapiro Capital Management LLC 3.34% 2,616,892 $55.0M
5 Elliott Investment Management L.P. 2.60% 28,000,000 $588.8M
6 Senvest Management, LLC 2.42% 3,922,718 $82.5M
7 Paragon Capital Management Ltd 1.92% 481,906 $10.1M
8 Graphene Investments SAS 1.82% 148,400 $3.1M
9 Leibman Financial Services, Inc. 1.60% 114,435 $2.4M
10 Board of the Pension Protection Fund 1.56% 78,300 $1.6M
11 Long Focus Capital Management, LLC 1.29% 2,405,000 $50.6M
12 Monimus Capital Management, LP 1.19% 243,667 $5.1M
13 Davis Selected Advisers 1.14% 12,574,721 $264.5M
14 Hidden Lake Asset Management LP 1.11% 175,000 $3.7M
15 Oaktop Capital Management II, L.P. 0.85% 950,000 $20.0M
16 Aurora Investment Counsel 0.84% 78,052 $1.6M
17 Game Creek Capital, LP 0.71% 95,000 $2.0M
18 Future Fund LLC 0.66% 109,767 $2.3M
19 SWS Partners 0.64% 141,330 $3.0M
20 Edmond de Rothschild Holding S.A. 0.63% 2,275,994 $47.9M
21 Discovery Capital Management, LLC / Ct 0.58% 665,969 $14.0M
22 Fulcrum Capital LLC 0.57% 132,858 $2.8M
23 Rare Wolf Capital LLC 0.55% 40,766 $857K
24 IFS Group,LLC 0.53% 18,488 $389K
25 Heron Bay Capital Management 0.52% 271,979 $5.7M
Investor Ownership
History
% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Pinterest Inc (PINS)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for PINS?

Selling streak — 4 quarters in a row: For 4 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds reduced or closed their PINS positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.

What is the institutional breadth score for PINS?

More sellers than buyers — 42% buying: Last quarter: 441 funds reduced or exited vs 325 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.

What is the fund quality score for PINS holders?

Elite ownership — 60% AUM from top-100 funds: 61 of 670 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 60% of total institutional value in PINS. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held PINS?

59% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 401 out of 676 hedge funds have held PINS for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →