Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Putnam Master Inter Income T (PIM)

58 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in PIM. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↓ -1
Streak
1Q ▼
Buyers last Q
67%

Smart Money Signals — PIM

Based on 59 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly

📉

Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row

last 6Q
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their PIM positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
🏔️

At the ownership peak (98% of max)

98% of all-time peak
59 hedge funds hold PIM right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
📶

Steady growth — +4% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
+2 new funds entered over the past year (+4% YoY). Gradual, steady growth in institutional ownership is generally a healthy signal — not a speculative rush, but consistent conviction.
🟢

More buyers than sellers — 67% buying

28 buying14 selling
Last quarter: 28 funds were net buyers (7 opened a brand new position + 21 added to an existing one). Only 14 were sellers (6 trimmed + 8 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.
➡️

Steady new buyers — ~7 new funds per quarter

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 8 → 10 → 11 → 7. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒

53% of holders stayed for 2+ years

■ 53% conviction (2yr+) ■ 17% medium ■ 31% new
31 out of 59 hedge funds have held PIM for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💎

Buying through price weakness — shares +1%, value -85%

Value
-85%
Shares
+0%
Last quarter: funds added +1% more shares while total portfolio value only changed -85%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
➡️

Steady discovery — ~7 new funds/quarter

7 → 8 → 10 → 11 → 7 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 8 → 10 → 11 → 7. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 58% veterans vs 32% newcomers

■ 58% veterans ■ 10% 1-2yr ■ 32% new
Entry-cohort mix of 59 holders: 34 (58%) are 2+ year veterans, 6 entered 1–2 years ago, and 19 (32%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
📋

Smaller funds dominant — 16% AUM from top-100

16% from top-100 AUM funds
9 of 59 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 16% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.
3.8
out of 10
Low Exit Risk
Exit risk score 3.8/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — PIM

In 2026 Q1, 28 hedge funds were net buyers of PIM (7 opened a new position, 21 added to an existing one), while 14 reduced or exited (6 trimmed, 8 sold completely) — a 67% buyer ratio, indicating clear institutional accumulation. Net fund flow last quarter: -1 funds (more exits than new entries). Total institutional holders: 59.

Hedge Fund Ownership: PIM

How many hedge funds hold PIM — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of PIM vs. share price

Market Analysis: PIM

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: PIM

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Is It Too Late to Buy Putnam Master Inter Income T (PIM) Based on Hedge Fund 13F Filings?

Signal Freshness measures how much PIM has moved relative to its sector benchmark (XLF) since the 2026 Q1 13F filing. A stock that has barely outrun its sector is still a relatively fresh entry point — the fund's thesis has not yet been priced in by the broader market.

Since Quarter End March 31, 2026 · 82d ago
PIM
-3.1%
XLF
+8.5%

PIM outperformed XLF by -11.6% since March 31, 2026.

Since 13F Filing Date May 15, 2026 · 37d ago
PIM
+0.6%
XLF
+4.8%

Since the filing became public, PIM outperformed XLF by -4.2% .

Interpretation: The stock is tracking its sector benchmark closely. The signal remains fresh and the entry point is still near the fund's implied reference. Learn more →

Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

1 top-rated funds 0 high-conviction
Consensus
1.3
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
0.2
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: PIM
58 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in PIM. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q1) Prior (2025 Q4) Change
Funds Holding 58 60 -3.33%
13F Shares 26M 27M -3.67%
Total Value $9M $89M -89.47%
New Positions 7 11 -4
Increased Positions 20 14 +6
Closed Positions 9 8 +1
Reduced Positions 6 14 -8
Total Calls 0 0 -
Total Puts 0 0 -
PUT/CALL Ratio 0.0 0.0 Bullish

Statistics: PIM

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q1)

58 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in PIM. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 PIM holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q1 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Pvg Asset Management Corp 2.34% 1,231,891 $4.0M
2 Penbrook Management LLC 0.36% 147,063 $481K
3 Melfa Wealth Management, INC. 0.15% 80,925 $265K
4 Gill Capital Partners, LLC 0.13% 139,689 $457K
5 WealthTrust Axiom LLC 0.09% 116,000 $379K
6 Sheets Smith Wealth Management 0.09% 238,084 $779K
7 1607 Capital Partners, LLC 0.08% 342,922 $1.1M
8 IFG Advisory, LLC 0.08% 8,500 $28K
9 Fortitude Advisory Group L.L.C. 0.08% 52,819 $173K
10 Mezzasalma Advisors, LLC 0.05% 54,708 $179K
11 Northstar Financial Companies, Inc. 0.04% 14,945 $49K
12 Eclectic Associates Inc /Adv 0.03% 72,101 $236K
13 Weaver Consulting Group 0.02% 32,000 $105K
14 Balefire, LLC 0.01% 21,182 $69K
15 Integrity Advisory Solutions, LLC 0.01% 26,532 $87K
16 Ethos Financial Group, LLC 0.01% 46,659 $156K
17 Invictus Private Wealth, LLC 0.01% 42,845 $140K
18 Global Wealth Strategies & Associates 0.01% 9,220 $30K
19 Key FInancial Inc 0.01% 9,500 $31K
20 Graves Light Lenhart Wealth, Inc. 0.00% 14,300 $47K
21 WealthShield Partners, LLC 0.00% 13,000 $43K
22 HUB Investment Partners, LLC 0.00% 39,848 $130K
23 Shufro Rose & Co LLC 0.00% 11,000 $36K
24 Measured Wealth Private Client Group, LLC 0.00% 2,500 $8K
25 Elevation Point Wealth Partners, LLC 0.00% 27,700 $91K
Investor Ownership
History 		% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Putnam Master Inter Income T (PIM)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for PIM?

Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row: For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their PIM positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.

What is the institutional breadth score for PIM?

More buyers than sellers — 67% buying: Last quarter: 28 funds were net buyers (7 opened a brand new position + 21 added to an existing one). Only 14 were sellers (6 trimmed + 8 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.

What is the fund quality score for PIM holders?

Smaller funds dominant — 16% AUM from top-100: 9 of 59 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 16% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.

How long have hedge funds held PIM?

53% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 31 out of 59 hedge funds have held PIM for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Is it too late to buy Putnam Master Inter Income T (PIM) following the 2026 Q1 hedge fund 13F filings?

As of today, PIM has moved +0.6% since the 2026 Q1 13F filing date (May 15, 2026), compared to +4.8% for the XLF sector ETF — an outperformance of -4.2%. Since the quarter end (March 31, 2026), PIM has gained -3.1% vs +8.5% for XLF. The stock is tracking its sector benchmark closely. The signal remains fresh and the entry point is still near the fund's implied reference.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →