Based on 17 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly
📉
Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their PGYWW positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
🔻
Below peak — only 57% of 3.0Y high
57% of all-time peak
Only 17 funds hold PGYWW today versus a peak of 30 funds at 2023 Q2 — just 57% of the maximum. Low institutional ownership can mean the stock is out of favor, but it also means there's a large pool of potential buyers if sentiment turns.
📉
Outflows — 11% fewer funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
2 fewer hedge funds hold PGYWW compared to a year ago (-11% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🟠
More sellers than buyers — 40% buying
4 buying6 selling
Last quarter: 6 funds reduced or exited vs 4 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~1 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 2 → 4 → 4 → 1. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒
71% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 71% conviction (2yr+)
■ 18% medium
■ 12% new
12 out of 17 hedge funds have held PGYWW for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💎
Buying through price weakness — shares -46%, value -100%
Last quarter: funds added -46% more shares while total portfolio value only changed -100%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
📊
Peak discovery — momentum slowing
3 → 2 → 4 → 4 → 1 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 2 → 4 → 4 → 1. PGYWW is well-known in the hedge fund world, but fresh entries are gradually declining. The explosive phase of institutional discovery is likely behind us.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 71% veterans vs 18% newcomers
■ 71% veterans
■ 12% 1-2yr
■ 18% new
Entry-cohort mix of 17 holders: 12 (71%) are 2+ year veterans, 2 entered 1–2 years ago, and 3 (18%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆
Elite ownership — 47% AUM from top-100 funds
47% from top-100 AUM funds
5 of 16 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 47% of total institutional value in PGYWW. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
Exit risk score 1.7/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.