Based on 24 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly
📈
Buying streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds added PDYNW than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
📊
High ownership — 92% of 3.0Y peak
92% of all-time peak
24 funds currently hold this stock — 92% of the 3.0-year high of 26 funds (reached 2024 Q3). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
🚀
Fast accumulation — +50% more funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
+8 new funds entered over the past year (+50% YoY). That's a rapid rush of institutional money. Fast accumulation often signals a major thesis — but it also means the stock could fall quickly if that thesis breaks.
🟢
More buyers than sellers — 70% buying
7 buying3 selling
Last quarter: 7 funds were net buyers (6 opened a brand new position + 1 added to an existing one). Only 3 were sellers (2 trimmed + 1 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~6 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 4 → 4 → 2 → 6. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒
54% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 54% conviction (2yr+)
■ 29% medium
■ 17% new
13 out of 24 hedge funds have held PDYNW for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💎
Buying through price weakness — shares -1%, value -21%
Last quarter: funds added -1% more shares while total portfolio value only changed -21%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~6 new funds/quarter
0 → 4 → 4 → 2 → 6 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 4 → 4 → 2 → 6. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 67% veterans vs 17% newcomers
■ 67% veterans
■ 17% 1-2yr
■ 17% new
Entry-cohort mix of 24 holders: 16 (67%) are 2+ year veterans, 4 entered 1–2 years ago, and 4 (17%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
📋
Smaller funds dominant — 12% AUM from top-100
12% from top-100 AUM funds
6 of 23 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 12% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.
Exit risk score 3.3/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.