Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Puma Biotechnology Inc (PBYI)

161 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in PBYI. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Fetching live quote...
Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↑ +6
Streak
11Q ▲
Buyers last Q
55%

Smart Money Signals — PBYI

Based on 162 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 11 quarters in a row

last 6Q
For 11 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added PBYI than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️

At the ownership peak (100% of max)

100% of all-time peak
162 hedge funds hold PBYI right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
🚀

Fast accumulation — +34% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
+41 new funds entered over the past year (+34% YoY). That's a rapid rush of institutional money. Fast accumulation often signals a major thesis — but it also means the stock could fall quickly if that thesis breaks.
🟡

Slight buying edge — 55% buying

87 buying70 selling
Last quarter: 87 funds bought or added vs 70 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.
➡️

Steady new buyers — ~26 new funds per quarter

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 25 → 33 → 27 → 26. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒

51% of holders stayed for 2+ years

51% conviction (2yr+) 25% medium 23% new
83 out of 162 hedge funds have held PBYI for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💰

Value +29% but shares only +2% — price-driven

Value
+28%
Shares
+2%
Last quarter: the total dollar value of institutional holdings rose +29%, but actual share count only changed +2%. The gap is explained by the stock's price rising — not new buying. Strong value growth with weak share growth means the rally is price momentum, not fresh institutional demand.
➡️

Steady discovery — ~26 new funds/quarter

21 → 25 → 33 → 27 → 26 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 25 → 33 → 27 → 26. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 57% veterans vs 31% newcomers

57% veterans 12% 1-2yr 31% new
Entry-cohort mix of 164 holders: 94 (57%) are 2+ year veterans, 19 entered 1–2 years ago, and 51 (31%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆

Elite ownership — 48% AUM from top-100 funds

48% from top-100 AUM funds
44 of 161 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 48% of total institutional value in PBYI. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
3.9
out of 10
Low Exit Risk
Exit risk score 3.9/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — PBYI

In 2026 Q2, 87 hedge funds were net buyers of PBYI (26 opened a new position, 61 added to an existing one), while 70 reduced or exited (50 trimmed, 20 sold completely) — a 55% buyer ratio, indicating a slight buying edge. This marks 11 consecutive quarters of net institutional buying — a persistent conviction signal. 48% of total institutional value in PBYI is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting elite-tier ownership quality. Net fund flow last quarter: +6 funds (more new holders than closures). Total institutional holders: 162.

Hedge Fund Ownership: PBYI

How many hedge funds hold PBYI — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of PBYI vs. share price

Market Analysis: PBYI

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: PBYI

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

9 top-rated funds 1 high-conviction
Consensus
4.3
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
0.9
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: PBYI
161 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in PBYI. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q2) Prior (2026 Q1) Change
Funds Holding 161 156 3.21%
13F Shares 39M 38M 2.42%
Total Value $284M $221M 28.94%
New Positions 26 27 -1
Increased Positions 61 61 -
Closed Positions 20 23 -3
Reduced Positions 49 38 +11
Total Calls 2 2 -
Total Puts 1 0 100%
PUT/CALL Ratio 0.5 0.0 Bullish

Statistics: PBYI

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

161 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in PBYI. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 PBYI holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Acorn Capital Advisors, LLC 9.14% 4,131,299 $33.5M
2 Haven Private, LLC 0.46% 148,448 $1.2M
3 Globeflex Capital L P 0.40% 382,807 $3.1M
4 Spark Investment Management LLC 0.27% 17,000 $138K
5 C2C Wealth Management, LLC 0.15% 23,620 $192K
6 Round Rock Advisors LLC 0.13% 128,912 $1.0M
7 Kennedy Capital Management LLC 0.13% 873,253 $7.1M
8 Bridgeway Capital Management, LLC 0.11% 791,616 $6.4M
9 Ritholtz Wealth Management 0.09% 749,798 $6.1M
10 Perkins Capital Management Inc 0.08% 13,400 $109K
11 Baron Wealth Management LLC 0.08% 36,372 $295K
12 Williams & Novak Wealth Management, LLC 0.06% 10,489 $85K
13 R Squared Ltd 0.05% 11,991 $97K
14 D'Orazio & Associates, Inc. 0.05% 48,680 $395K
15 O'shaughnessy Asset Management, LLC 0.04% 1,123,783 $9.1M
16 Philadelphia Investment Partners, LLC 0.04% 8,000 $65K
17 State of Wyoming 0.03% 39,833 $323K
18 Renaissance Technologies LLC 0.02% 1,836,213 $14.9M
19 One Wealth Advisors, LLC 0.02% 21,079 $171K
20 Prospera Financial Services Inc 0.02% 158,762 $1.3M
21 Abel Hall, LLC 0.02% 11,520 $93K
22 Kathmere Capital Management, LLC 0.01% 31,172 $253K
23 Prelude Capital Management, LLC 0.01% 21,548 $175K
24 WINTON GROUP Ltd 0.01% 40,509 $329K
25 Evergreen Capital Management LLC 0.01% 73,731 $598K
Investor Ownership
History
% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Puma Biotechnology Inc (PBYI)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for PBYI?

Buying streak — 11 quarters in a row: For 11 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added PBYI than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for PBYI?

Slight buying edge — 55% buying: Last quarter: 87 funds bought or added vs 70 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.

What is the fund quality score for PBYI holders?

Elite ownership — 48% AUM from top-100 funds: 44 of 161 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 48% of total institutional value in PBYI. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held PBYI?

51% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 83 out of 162 hedge funds have held PBYI for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →