Pgim Rock ETF Tr (PBJL) Hedge Fund Ownership (Q2 2026)

Pgim Rock ETF Tr (PBJL)

16 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in PBJL. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Smart Money Signals — PBJL

Based on 16 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly

📉

Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row

last 6Q

For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their PBJL positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.

📊

High ownership — 89% of 2.2Y peak

89% of all-time peak

16 funds currently hold this stock — 89% of the 2.2-year high of 18 funds (reached 2026 Q1). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.

🚀

Fast accumulation — +33% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q

+4 new funds entered over the past year (+33% YoY). That's a rapid rush of institutional money. Fast accumulation often signals a major thesis — but it also means the stock could fall quickly if that thesis breaks.

🟢

More buyers than sellers — 61% buying

11 buying7 selling

Last quarter: 11 funds were net buyers (3 opened a brand new position + 8 added to an existing one). Only 7 were sellers (2 trimmed + 5 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.

➡️

Steady new buyers — ~3 new funds per quarter

new funds entering per quarter

Funds opening this position for the first time: 5 → 2 → 5 → 3. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.

🔄

Mostly new holders — 31% entered in last year

■ 6% conviction (2yr+) ■ 62% medium ■ 31% new

Only 1 funds (6%) have held >2 years. The majority of current holders are relatively new to the position. New holders tend to sell faster when prices drop — a shallow conviction base that could amplify any sell-off.

➡️

Steady discovery — ~3 new funds/quarter

3 → 5 → 2 → 5 → 3 new funds/Q

New funds entering each quarter: 5 → 2 → 5 → 3. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.

🌱

Early stage — 62% of holders entered in last year

■ 0% veterans ■ 38% 1-2yr ■ 62% new

Of 16 current holders: 10 (62%) entered in the past year, only 0 (0%) are 2+ year veterans. This is an early-phase institutional idea — still being discovered. High upside potential if the thesis plays out, but thin conviction base.

📋

Smaller funds dominant — 0% AUM from top-100

0% from top-100 AUM funds

2 of 16 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 0% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.

3.7

out of 10

Low Exit Risk

Exit risk score 3.7/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Metric	All 13F Filers (2026 Q2)	Prior (2026 Q1)	Change
Funds Holding	16	18	-11.11%
13F Shares	1M	1M	21.92%
Total Value	$46M	$36M	26.16%
New Positions	3	5	-2
Increased Positions	8	2	+6
Closed Positions	5	1	+4
Reduced Positions	2	6	-4
Total Calls	0	0	-
Total Puts	0	0	-
PUT/CALL Ratio	0.0	0.0	Bullish

Metric

All 13F Filers (2026 Q2)

Prior (2026 Q1)

Change

Funds Holding

-11.11%

13F Shares

21.92%

Total Value

$46M

$36M

26.16%

New Positions

-2

Increased Positions

Closed Positions

Reduced Positions

-4

Total Calls

Total Puts

PUT/CALL Ratio

0.0

Bullish

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

16 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in PBJL. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:

FILTER:All New Added To Reduced No Change | Overweight >5%

Top 16 PBJL holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
#	Investor	% of Portfolio	Shares	Mkt Value
1	American Asset Management INC.	2.10%	82,439	$2.6M
2	Foguth Wealth Management, LLC.	1.64%	460,078	$14.4M
3	Jim Saulnier & Associates, LLC	1.60%	127,411	$4.0M
4	Blue Water Asset Management	0.40%	39,232	$1.2M
5	Long Island Wealth Management, Inc.	0.22%	17,034	$533K
6	Centaurus Financial, INC.	0.17%	139,426	$4.4M
7	BCGM Wealth Management, LLC	0.08%	11,730	$367K
8	DHJJ Financial Advisors, Ltd.	0.06%	6,495	$203K
9	Kintra Wealth, LLC	0.03%	18,674	$596K
10	Spire Wealth Management	0.02%	20,808	$651K
11	Prudential Financial Inc	0.02%	484,546	$15.2M
12	Commonwealth Equity Services, LLC	0.00%	32,928	$1.0M
13	Steward Partners Investment Advisory, LLC	0.00%	1,916	$60K
14	Raymond James Financial Inc	0.00%	15,050	$471K
15	PNC Financial Services Group, INC.	0.00%	866	$27K
16	UBS Group AG	0.00%	131	$4K

Investor	Ownership History	% of Portfolio	Prev %	Rank	Conviction	Avg Buy Price	13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y	Sell Timing	Shares	Mkt Value	Change	Change %	Source	Quarter	Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Pgim Rock ETF Tr (PBJL)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for PBJL?

Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row: For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their PBJL positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.

What is the institutional breadth score for PBJL?

More buyers than sellers — 61% buying: Last quarter: 11 funds were net buyers (3 opened a brand new position + 8 added to an existing one). Only 7 were sellers (2 trimmed + 5 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.

What is the fund quality score for PBJL holders?

Smaller funds dominant — 0% AUM from top-100: 2 of 16 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 0% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.

How long have hedge funds held PBJL?

Mostly new holders — 31% entered in last year: Only 1 funds (6%) have held >2 years. The majority of current holders are relatively new to the position. New holders tend to sell faster when prices drop — a shallow conviction base that could amplify any sell-off.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Market Cap	--
Enterprise Value	--
Trailing P/E	--
Forward P/E	--
PEG Ratio (5yr expected)	--
Price/Sales (ttm)	--
Price/Book (mrq)	--
Enterprise Value/Revenue	--
Enterprise Value/EBITDA	--
Beta (5Y Monthly)	--
Short Ratio (Days to Cover)	--
Short % of Float	--

Profit Margin	--
Return on Assets (ttm)	--
Return on Equity (ttm)	--

Revenue (ttm)	--
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm)	--
Diluted EPS (ttm)	--
Total Cash (mrq)	--
Total Debt/Equity (mrq)	--
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm)	--

Pgim Rock ETF Tr (PBJL)

Smart Money Signals — PBJL

Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row

High ownership — 89% of 2.2Y peak

Fast accumulation — +33% more funds vs a year ago

More buyers than sellers — 61% buying

Steady new buyers — ~3 new funds per quarter

Mostly new holders — 31% entered in last year

Steady discovery — ~3 new funds/quarter

Early stage — 62% of holders entered in last year

Smaller funds dominant — 0% AUM from top-100

Institutional Sentiment Summary — PBJL

Hedge Fund Ownership: PBJL

Market Analysis: PBJL

Analyst Price Targets

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Company Profile: PBJL

Hedge Fund Positioning: PBJL

Statistics: PBJL

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Financial Highlights

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

Frequently Asked Questions — Pgim Rock ETF Tr (PBJL)

Welcome to 13Foresight!