Based on 49 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly
➡️
No change last quarter
The number of hedge funds holding this stock didn't change last quarter. Neither a buying nor selling signal on its own — watch the next quarter for direction.
📊
High ownership — 79% of 3.0Y peak
79% of all-time peak
49 funds currently hold this stock — 79% of the 3.0-year high of 62 funds (reached 2025 Q3). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
📉
Outflows — 6% fewer funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
3 fewer hedge funds hold OXSQ compared to a year ago (-6% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🟡
Slight buying edge — 58% buying
26 buying19 selling
Last quarter: 26 funds bought or added vs 19 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~12 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 17 → 9 → 11 → 12. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒
43% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 43% conviction (2yr+)
■ 33% medium
■ 24% new
21 out of 49 hedge funds have held OXSQ for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💎
Buying through price weakness — shares -11%, value -32%
Last quarter: funds added -11% more shares while total portfolio value only changed -32%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~12 new funds/quarter
10 → 17 → 9 → 11 → 12 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 17 → 9 → 11 → 12. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 45% veterans vs 29% newcomers
■ 45% veterans
■ 27% 1-2yr
■ 29% new
Entry-cohort mix of 49 holders: 22 (45%) are 2+ year veterans, 13 entered 1–2 years ago, and 14 (29%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆
Elite ownership — 55% AUM from top-100 funds
55% from top-100 AUM funds
11 of 48 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 55% of total institutional value in OXSQ. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
Exit risk score 2.6/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.