Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Accendra Health Inc (OMI)

139 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in OMI. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↓ -27
Streak
4Q ▼
Buyers last Q
39%

Smart Money Signals — OMI

Based on 140 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly

📉

Selling streak — 4 quarters in a row

last 6Q
For 4 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds reduced or closed their OMI positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
🔻

Below peak — only 58% of 3.0Y high

58% of all-time peak
Only 140 funds hold OMI today versus a peak of 240 funds at 2025 Q1 — just 58% of the maximum. Low institutional ownership can mean the stock is out of favor, but it also means there's a large pool of potential buyers if sentiment turns.
📉

Outflows — 42% fewer funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
100 fewer hedge funds hold OMI compared to a year ago (-42% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🔴

Heavy selling pressure — only 39% buying

68 buying105 selling
Last quarter: 105 funds sold vs only 68 buyers. This is widespread institutional distribution — not a few funds rebalancing, but a broad exit. High conviction bearish signal.
➡️

Steady new buyers — ~27 new funds per quarter

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 35 → 32 → 26 → 27. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒

69% of holders stayed for 2+ years

■ 69% conviction (2yr+) ■ 16% medium ■ 14% new
97 out of 140 hedge funds have held OMI for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💎

Buying through price weakness — shares -8%, value -26%

Value
-26%
Shares
-8%
Last quarter: funds added -8% more shares while total portfolio value only changed -26%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
📊

Peak discovery — momentum slowing

65 → 35 → 32 → 26 → 27 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 35 → 32 → 26 → 27. OMI is well-known in the hedge fund world, but fresh entries are gradually declining. The explosive phase of institutional discovery is likely behind us.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 75% veterans vs 18% newcomers

■ 75% veterans ■ 7% 1-2yr ■ 18% new
Entry-cohort mix of 145 holders: 109 (75%) are 2+ year veterans, 10 entered 1–2 years ago, and 26 (18%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆

Elite ownership — 43% AUM from top-100 funds

43% from top-100 AUM funds
38 of 139 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 43% of total institutional value in OMI. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
1.8
out of 10
Low Exit Risk
Exit risk score 1.8/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — OMI

In 2026 Q1, 68 hedge funds were net buyers of OMI (27 opened a new position, 41 added to an existing one), while 105 reduced or exited (51 trimmed, 54 sold completely) — a 39% buyer ratio, indicating net institutional distribution. This extends a 4-quarter selling streak, suggesting sustained institutional caution. 43% of total institutional value in OMI is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting elite-tier ownership quality. Net fund flow last quarter: -27 funds (more exits than new entries). Total institutional holders: 140.

Hedge Fund Ownership: OMI

How many hedge funds hold OMI — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of OMI vs. share price

Market Analysis: OMI

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: OMI

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

14 top-rated funds 0 high-conviction
Consensus
5.1
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
0.3
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: OMI
2026 Q2 Stats Unlock in 5 days 139 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in OMI. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q1) Prior (2025 Q4) Change
Funds Holding 139 167 -16.77%
13F Shares 64M 70M -8.36%
Total Value $145M $198M -26.41%
New Positions 26 26 -
Increased Positions 37 52 -15
Closed Positions 54 58 -4
Reduced Positions 50 69 -19
Total Calls 4 5 -20.0%
Total Puts 2 6 -66.67%
PUT/CALL Ratio 0.5 1.2 Bullish

Statistics: OMI

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

139 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in OMI. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
2026 Q2 filings are still coming in. Only funds that have filed so far are shown — top holders may not have reported yet. Full 13F data typically settles by ~50 days after quarter-end.
Top 25 OMI holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q1 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Kennondale Capital Management LLC 0.51% 225,890 $773K
2 Paradigm Capital Management Inc/Ny 0.24% 2,536,699 $8.7M
3 Dana Investment Advisors, Inc. 0.17% 1,944,607 $6.7M
4 Williams & Novak Wealth Management, LLC 0.09% 38,200 $131K
5 Linden Thomas Advisory Services, LLC 0.08% 272,661 $933K
6 State of Wyoming 0.03% 99,061 $339K
7 Massar Capital Management, LP 0.03% 102,190 $349K
8 BW Gestao de Investimentos Ltda. 0.03% 423,091 $1.4M
9 Wolverine Asset Management LLC 0.02% 568,084 $1.9M
10 Abel Hall, LLC 0.01% 20,113 $69K
11 Connor, Clark & Lunn Investment Management Ltd. 0.01% 1,288,787 $4.4M
12 Marshall Wace, LLP 0.01% 2,582,579 $8.8M
13 Plancorp, LLC 0.01% 81,666 $275K
14 XTX Topco Ltd 0.01% 147,288 $504K
15 Milestone Asset Management, LLC 0.01% 12,000 $41K
16 Bridgeway Capital Management, LLC 0.01% 106,000 $363K
17 Pekin Hardy Strauss, Inc. 0.01% 20,000 $68K
18 Aristeia Capital, L.L.C. 0.01% 130,816 $447K
19 Heritage Wealth Advisors 0.01% 46,894 $160K
20 Essential Partners LLC 0.00% 2,230 $8K
21 Strs Ohio 0.00% 209,400 $716K
22 Graham Capital Management, L.P. 0.00% 38,236 $131K
23 Waldron Private Wealth LLC 0.00% 18,684 $64K
24 Two Sigma Investments, LP 0.00% 718,550 $2.5M
25 Renaissance Technologies LLC 0.00% 324,413 $1.1M
Investor Ownership
History 		% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Accendra Health Inc (OMI)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for OMI?

Selling streak — 4 quarters in a row: For 4 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds reduced or closed their OMI positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.

What is the institutional breadth score for OMI?

Heavy selling pressure — only 39% buying: Last quarter: 105 funds sold vs only 68 buyers. This is widespread institutional distribution — not a few funds rebalancing, but a broad exit. High conviction bearish signal.

What is the fund quality score for OMI holders?

Elite ownership — 43% AUM from top-100 funds: 38 of 139 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 43% of total institutional value in OMI. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held OMI?

69% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 97 out of 140 hedge funds have held OMI for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →