Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Co2 Energy Transition Corp (NOEMW)

20 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in NOEMW. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Fetching live quote...
Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↓ -3
Streak
1Q ▼
Buyers last Q
36%

Smart Money Signals — NOEMW

Based on 20 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly

📉

Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row

last 6Q
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their NOEMW positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
📊

High ownership — 87% of 2.8Y peak

87% of all-time peak
20 funds currently hold this stock — 87% of the 2.8-year high of 23 funds (reached 2026 Q1). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
📶

Steady growth — +5% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
+1 new funds entered over the past year (+5% YoY). Gradual, steady growth in institutional ownership is generally a healthy signal — not a speculative rush, but consistent conviction.
🔴

Heavy selling pressure — only 36% buying

4 buying7 selling
Last quarter: 7 funds sold vs only 4 buyers. This is widespread institutional distribution — not a few funds rebalancing, but a broad exit. High conviction bearish signal.
➡️

Steady new buyers — ~1 new funds per quarter

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 3 → 2 → 3 → 1. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔄

Mostly new holders — 15% entered in last year

5% conviction (2yr+) 80% medium 15% new
Only 1 funds (5%) have held >2 years. The majority of current holders are relatively new to the position. New holders tend to sell faster when prices drop — a shallow conviction base that could amplify any sell-off.
💎

Buying through price weakness — shares -19%, value -95%

Value
-95%
Shares
-18%
Last quarter: funds added -19% more shares while total portfolio value only changed -95%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
📊

Peak discovery — momentum slowing

4 → 3 → 2 → 3 → 1 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 3 → 2 → 3 → 1. NOEMW is well-known in the hedge fund world, but fresh entries are gradually declining. The explosive phase of institutional discovery is likely behind us.
📊

Mixed cohorts — 5% veterans, 40% new entrants

5% veterans 55% 1-2yr 40% new
Of 20 current holders: 1 (5%) held 2+ years, 11 held 1–2 years, 8 (40%) entered in the past year. Balanced distribution — some institutional memory, some recent momentum buyers.
📋

Smaller funds dominant — 1% AUM from top-100

1% from top-100 AUM funds
2 of 20 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 1% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.
3.6
out of 10
Low Exit Risk
Exit risk score 3.6/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — NOEMW

In 2026 Q2, 4 hedge funds were net buyers of NOEMW (1 opened a new position, 3 added to an existing one), while 7 reduced or exited (3 trimmed, 4 sold completely) — a 36% buyer ratio, indicating net institutional distribution. Net fund flow last quarter: -3 funds (more exits than new entries). Total institutional holders: 20.

Hedge Fund Ownership: NOEMW

How many hedge funds hold NOEMW — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of NOEMW vs. share price

Market Analysis: NOEMW

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: NOEMW

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

2 top-rated funds 0 high-conviction
Consensus
2.1
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
0.0
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: NOEMW
20 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in NOEMW. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q2) Prior (2026 Q1) Change
Funds Holding 20 23 -13.04%
13F Shares 5M 6M -18.52%
Total Value $3M $61M -95.04%
New Positions 1 3 -2
Increased Positions 3 2 +1
Closed Positions 4 0 +4
Reduced Positions 3 3 -
Total Calls 0 0 -
Total Puts 0 0 -
PUT/CALL Ratio 0.0 0.0 Bullish

Statistics: NOEMW

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

20 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in NOEMW. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 19 NOEMW holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Lepercq De Neuflize Asset Management LLC 0.01% 93,953 $12K
2 MMCAP International Inc. SPC 0.01% 590,000 $73K
3 Rivernorth Capital Management, LLC 0.00% 428,040 $68K
4 K2 Principal Fund, L.P. 0.00% 155,312 $19K
5 Shaolin Capital Management LLC 0.00% 200,956 $25K
6 Aristeia Capital, L.L.C. 0.00% 578,096 $84K
7 Lineage Point Capital LP 0.00% 40,954 $5K
8 AQR Arbitrage LLC 0.00% 581,171 $71K
9 Whitebox Advisors LLC 0.00% 390,000 $48K
10 DLD Asset Management, LP 0.00% 74,591 $9K
11 Polar Asset Management Partners Inc. 0.00% 290,000 $36K
12 Highbridge Capital Management LLC 0.00% 149,739 $22K
13 Clear Street Group Inc. 0.00% 374,963 $46K
14 Hudson Bay Capital Management LP 0.00% 290,000 $42K
15 Centiva Capital, LP 0.00% 40,000 $6K
16 Toronto Dominion Bank 0.00% 320,000 $39K
17 D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. 0.00% 280,000 $41K
18 Wolverine Asset Management LLC 0.00% 700
19 UBS Group AG 0.00% 1,700
Investor Ownership
History
% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Co2 Energy Transition Corp (NOEMW)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for NOEMW?

Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row: For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their NOEMW positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.

What is the institutional breadth score for NOEMW?

Heavy selling pressure — only 36% buying: Last quarter: 7 funds sold vs only 4 buyers. This is widespread institutional distribution — not a few funds rebalancing, but a broad exit. High conviction bearish signal.

What is the fund quality score for NOEMW holders?

Smaller funds dominant — 1% AUM from top-100: 2 of 20 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 1% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.

How long have hedge funds held NOEMW?

Mostly new holders — 15% entered in last year: Only 1 funds (5%) have held >2 years. The majority of current holders are relatively new to the position. New holders tend to sell faster when prices drop — a shallow conviction base that could amplify any sell-off.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →