Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

NEXTERA ENERGY INC (NEE/PRS)

63 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in NEE/PRS. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Fetching live quote...
Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↑ +5
Streak
1Q ▲
Buyers last Q
42%

Smart Money Signals — NEE/PRS

Based on 63 hedge funds · latest filing: 2025 Q4 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 1 quarter in a row

last 6Q
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds added NEE/PRS than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️

At the ownership peak (100% of max)

100% of all-time peak
63 hedge funds hold NEE/PRS right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
📶

Steady growth — +9% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
+5 new funds entered over the past year (+9% YoY). Gradual, steady growth in institutional ownership is generally a healthy signal — not a speculative rush, but consistent conviction.
🟠

More sellers than buyers — 42% buying

25 buying34 selling
Last quarter: 34 funds reduced or exited vs 25 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.
➡️

Steady new buyers — ~10 new funds per quarter

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 11 → 6 → 8 → 10. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔄

Mostly new holders — 25% entered in last year

3% conviction (2yr+) 71% medium 25% new
Only 2 funds (3%) have held >2 years. The majority of current holders are relatively new to the position. New holders tend to sell faster when prices drop — a shallow conviction base that could amplify any sell-off.
💎

Buying through price weakness — shares -3%, value -99%

Value
-99%
Shares
-3%
Last quarter: funds added -3% more shares while total portfolio value only changed -99%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
➡️

Steady discovery — ~10 new funds/quarter

8 → 11 → 6 → 8 → 10 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 11 → 6 → 8 → 10. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
📊

Mixed cohorts — 5% veterans, 33% new entrants

5% veterans 62% 1-2yr 33% new
Of 63 current holders: 3 (5%) held 2+ years, 39 held 1–2 years, 21 (33%) entered in the past year. Balanced distribution — some institutional memory, some recent momentum buyers.
🏆

Elite ownership — 46% AUM from top-100 funds

46% from top-100 AUM funds
20 of 63 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 46% of total institutional value in NEE/PRS. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
4.1
out of 10
Moderate Exit Risk
Exit risk score 4.1/10 — some crowding factors present, but no critical concentration. Watch ownership trend over the next 1–2 quarters for direction.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Hedge Fund Ownership: NEE/PRS

How many hedge funds hold NEE/PRS — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of NEE/PRS vs. share price

Market Analysis: NEE/PRS

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: NEE/PRS

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

16 top-rated funds 0 high-conviction
Consensus
5.3
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
1.1
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: NEE/PRS
2026 Q1 Stats Unlock in 14 days 63 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in NEE/PRS. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2025 Q4) Prior (2025 Q3) Change
Funds Holding 63 58 8.62%
13F Shares 40M 42M -3.42%
Total Value $1.85B $195.89B -99.06%
New Positions 10 8 +2
Increased Positions 15 14 +1
Closed Positions 5 10 -5
Reduced Positions 29 26 +3
Total Calls 0 0 -
Total Puts 0 0 -
PUT/CALL Ratio 0.0 0.0 Bullish

Statistics: NEE/PRS

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q1)

63 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in NEE/PRS. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

Top 17 institutional holders of NEE/PRS — 2025 Q4 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 MACKAY SHIELDS LLC 0.98% 472,936 $26.7M
2 Andrew Hill Investment Advisors, Inc. 0.45% 9,020 $505K
3 AEGON USA Investment Management, LLC 0.35% 8,000 $449K
4 Portman Square Capital LLP 0.22% 100,000 $5.7M
5 Meridian Wealth Management, LLC 0.16% 81,405 $4.6M
6 Calamos Advisors LLC 0.15% 775,097 $43.4M
7 THRIVENT FINANCIAL FOR LUTHERANS 0.03% 271,460 $15K
8 CREDIT INDUSTRIEL ET COMMERCIAL 0.03% 325,000 $325K
9 WOLVERINE ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC 0.02% 29,049 $1.6M
10 Calamos Wealth Management LLC 0.01% 4,835 $271K
11 WOLFF WIESE MAGANA LLC 0.01% 220 $12K
12 OPPENHEIMER & CO INC 0.00% 4,225 $237K
13 OPPENHEIMER ASSET MANAGEMENT INC. 0.00% 4,163 $233K
14 Cambridge Investment Research Advisors, Inc. 0.00% 16,874
15 WHITTIER TRUST CO 0.00% 3,645 $205K
16 ENVESTNET ASSET MANAGEMENT INC 0.00% 23,748 $1.3M
17 UBS Group AG 0.00% 15,793 $884K
Investor Ownership
History
% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — NEXTERA ENERGY INC (NEE/PRS)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for NEE/PRS?

Buying streak — 1 quarter in a row: For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds added NEE/PRS than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for NEE/PRS?

More sellers than buyers — 42% buying: Last quarter: 34 funds reduced or exited vs 25 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.

What is the fund quality score for NEE/PRS holders?

Elite ownership — 46% AUM from top-100 funds: 20 of 63 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 46% of total institutional value in NEE/PRS. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held NEE/PRS?

Mostly new holders — 25% entered in last year: Only 2 funds (3%) have held >2 years. The majority of current holders are relatively new to the position. New holders tend to sell faster when prices drop — a shallow conviction base that could amplify any sell-off.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.