Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Northern Dynasty Minerals Lt (NAK)

203 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in NAK. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↑ +14
Streak
10Q ▲
Buyers last Q
60%

Smart Money Signals — NAK

Based on 205 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 10 quarters in a row

last 6Q
For 10 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added NAK than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️

At the ownership peak (100% of max)

100% of all-time peak
205 hedge funds hold NAK right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
🚀

Fast accumulation — +38% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
+56 new funds entered over the past year (+38% YoY). That's a rapid rush of institutional money. Fast accumulation often signals a major thesis — but it also means the stock could fall quickly if that thesis breaks.
🟢

More buyers than sellers — 60% buying

109 buying73 selling
Last quarter: 109 funds were net buyers (45 opened a brand new position + 64 added to an existing one). Only 73 were sellers (42 trimmed + 31 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.
⚠️

Fewer new buyers each quarter (-7 vs last Q)

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 37 → 45 → 52 → 45. Each quarter fewer new institutions are entering. This usually means most funds that wanted in are already in — the stock is well-known but the pool of potential new buyers is shrinking.
📌

Mixed — 39% long-term, 34% new

■ 39% conviction (2yr+) ■ 28% medium ■ 34% new
Of the 205 current holders: 79 (39%) held >2 years, 57 held 1–2 years, and 69 entered in the last year. A mixed base — the stock has long-term believers but also recent buyers who haven't been tested by a downturn yet.
💰

Price up while funds trimmed (+32% value, -3% shares)

Value
+31%
Shares
-2%
Last quarter: total value of institutional NAK holdings rose +32% even though funds reduced share count by 3%. The stock price increased enough to offset the selling. Institutions are quietly trimming into price strength — watch for rotation.
📈

Growing discovery — still being found

31 → 37 → 45 → 52 → 45 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 37 → 45 → 52 → 45. A growing number of institutions are discovering NAK each quarter. The narrative is still spreading — leaving room for ongoing capital accumulation.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 49% veterans vs 40% newcomers

■ 49% veterans ■ 11% 1-2yr ■ 40% new
Entry-cohort mix of 213 holders: 105 (49%) are 2+ year veterans, 23 entered 1–2 years ago, and 85 (40%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
✅

Strong quality — 20% AUM from major funds

20% from top-100 AUM funds
32 of 204 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, accounting for 20% of total institutional value held. A meaningful share of the ownership value comes from the most well-resourced institutions.
4.3
out of 10
Moderate Exit Risk
Exit risk score 4.3/10 — some crowding factors present, but no critical concentration. Watch ownership trend over the next 1–2 quarters for direction.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — NAK

In 2026 Q2, 109 hedge funds were net buyers of NAK (45 opened a new position, 64 added to an existing one), while 73 reduced or exited (42 trimmed, 31 sold completely) — a 60% buyer ratio, indicating clear institutional accumulation. This marks 10 consecutive quarters of net institutional buying — a persistent conviction signal. 20% of total institutional value in NAK is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting strong institutional quality. Net fund flow last quarter: +14 funds (more new holders than closures). Total institutional holders: 205.

Hedge Fund Ownership: NAK

How many hedge funds hold NAK — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of NAK vs. share price

Market Analysis: NAK

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: NAK

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

10 top-rated funds 1 high-conviction
Consensus
4.5
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
2.1
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: NAK
2026 Q3 Stats Unlock in 47 days 203 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in NAK. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q2) Prior (2026 Q1) Change
Funds Holding 203 191 6.28%
13F Shares 118M 121M -2.9%
Total Value $224M $170M 31.8%
New Positions 44 52 -8
Increased Positions 63 44 +19
Closed Positions 31 31 -
Reduced Positions 38 45 -7
Total Calls 6 6 -
Total Puts 3 3 -
PUT/CALL Ratio 0.5 0.5 Bullish

Statistics: NAK

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

203 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in NAK. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 NAK holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Kopernik Global Investors, LLC 3.79% 32,178,392 $61.8M
2 Stenham Asset Management Ltd 2.81% 2,046,000 $3.9M
3 GAM Holding AG 0.35% 2,860,000 $4.0M
4 Aletheian Wealth Advisors LLC 0.14% 168,200 $323K
5 LCM Capital Management Inc 0.11% 131,644 $253K
6 Ionic Capital Management LLC 0.10% 345,686 $664K
7 Brady Family Wealth, LLC 0.06% 110,000 $211K
8 MIRAE ASSET GLOBAL ETFS HOLDINGS Ltd. 0.06% 26,369,817 $50.4M
9 Western Reserve Capital Management, LLC 0.06% 40,106 $77K
10 Allium Financial Advisors, LLC 0.04% 35,000 $67K
11 Ground Swell Capital, LLC 0.04% 20,100 $39K
12 Nations Financial Group Inc, /Ia/ /Adv 0.04% 431,300 $828K
13 Sage Investment Advisers LLC 0.03% 26,000 $50K
14 Game Plan Financial Advisors, LLC 0.03% 45,000 $86K
15 Scratch Capital LLC 0.03% 32,434 $62K
16 Cadinha & Co LLC 0.03% 100,000 $192K
17 626 Financial, LLC 0.03% 34,200 $66K
18 IFC & Insurance Marketing, Inc. 0.02% 11,115 $21K
19 TCFG Investment Advisors, LLC 0.02% 26,600 $51K
20 Blueshift Asset Management, LLC 0.01% 30,517 $59K
21 Stone House Investment Management, LLC 0.01% 51,575 $99K
22 One Plus One Wealth Management, LLC 0.01% 15,494 $30K
23 Pasadena Private Wealth, LLC 0.01% 52,453 $101K
24 Renaissance Technologies LLC 0.01% 4,650,149 $8.9M
25 Thompson Davis & CO., INC. 0.01% 10,000 $19K
Investor Ownership
History 		% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Northern Dynasty Minerals Lt (NAK)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for NAK?

Buying streak — 10 quarters in a row: For 10 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added NAK than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for NAK?

More buyers than sellers — 60% buying: Last quarter: 109 funds were net buyers (45 opened a brand new position + 64 added to an existing one). Only 73 were sellers (42 trimmed + 31 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.

What is the fund quality score for NAK holders?

Strong quality — 20% AUM from major funds: 32 of 204 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, accounting for 20% of total institutional value held. A meaningful share of the ownership value comes from the most well-resourced institutions.

How long have hedge funds held NAK?

Mixed — 39% long-term, 34% new: Of the 205 current holders: 79 (39%) held >2 years, 57 held 1–2 years, and 69 entered in the last year. A mixed base — the stock has long-term believers but also recent buyers who haven't been tested by a downturn yet.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →