Columbia ETF Tr I (MUST) Hedge Fund Ownership (Q2 2026)

Q: Is it too late to buy Columbia ETF Tr I (MUST) following the 2026 Q2 hedge fund 13F filings?

As of today, MUST has moved -3.4% since the 2026 Q2 13F filing date (August 14, 2026), compared to -0.7% for the SPY sector ETF — an outperformance of -2.7%. Since the quarter end (June 30, 2026), MUST gained -5.7% vs +3.3% for SPY. The stock is tracking its sector benchmark closely. The signal remains fresh and the entry point is still near the fund's implied reference.

Columbia ETF Tr I (MUST)

85 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in MUST. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Smart Money Signals — MUST

Based on 85 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly

➡️

No change last quarter

last 6Q

The number of hedge funds holding this stock didn't change last quarter. Neither a buying nor selling signal on its own — watch the next quarter for direction.

🏔️

At the ownership peak (100% of max)

100% of all-time peak

85 hedge funds hold MUST right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.

📶

Steady growth — +6% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q

+5 new funds entered over the past year (+6% YoY). Gradual, steady growth in institutional ownership is generally a healthy signal — not a speculative rush, but consistent conviction.

🟢

More buyers than sellers — 62% buying

55 buying34 selling

Last quarter: 55 funds were net buyers (11 opened a brand new position + 44 added to an existing one). Only 34 were sellers (23 trimmed + 11 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.

➡️

Steady new buyers — ~11 new funds per quarter

new funds entering per quarter

Funds opening this position for the first time: 12 → 9 → 14 → 11. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.

🔒

55% of holders stayed for 2+ years

■ 55% conviction (2yr+) ■ 20% medium ■ 25% new

47 out of 85 hedge funds have held MUST for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

📈

Growing discovery — still being found

12 → 12 → 9 → 14 → 11 new funds/Q

New funds entering each quarter: 12 → 9 → 14 → 11. A growing number of institutions are discovering MUST each quarter. The narrative is still spreading — leaving room for ongoing capital accumulation.

🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 59% veterans vs 26% newcomers

■ 59% veterans ■ 15% 1-2yr ■ 26% new

Entry-cohort mix of 85 holders: 50 (59%) are 2+ year veterans, 13 entered 1–2 years ago, and 22 (26%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.

🏆

Elite ownership — 72% AUM from top-100 funds

72% from top-100 AUM funds

14 of 85 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 72% of total institutional value in MUST. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

3.7

out of 10

Low Exit Risk

Exit risk score 3.7/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Metric	All 13F Filers (2026 Q2)	Prior (2026 Q1)	Change
Funds Holding	85	85	-
13F Shares	22M	22M	3.22%
Total Value	$462M	$441M	4.55%
New Positions	11	14	-3
Increased Positions	44	37	+7
Closed Positions	11	7	+4
Reduced Positions	23	20	+3
Total Calls	0	0	-
Total Puts	0	0	-
PUT/CALL Ratio	0.0	0.0	Bullish

Metric

All 13F Filers (2026 Q2)

Prior (2026 Q1)

Change

Funds Holding

13F Shares

22M

3.22%

Total Value

$462M

$441M

4.55%

New Positions

-3

Increased Positions

Closed Positions

Reduced Positions

Total Calls

Total Puts

PUT/CALL Ratio

0.0

Bullish

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

85 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in MUST. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:

FILTER:All New Added To Reduced No Change | Overweight >5%

Top 25 MUST holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
#	Investor	% of Portfolio	Shares	Mkt Value
1	Haven Private, LLC	9.40%	1,188,853	$24.7M
2	Arbor Capital Management Inc /Adv	1.65%	81,654	$1.7M
3	Frederick Financial Consultants, LLC	1.40%	158,981	$3.3M
4	Genesis Private Wealth, LLC	0.83%	141,222	$2.9M
5	Arq Wealth Advisors, LLC	0.74%	292,528	$6.0M
6	Global Wealth Strategies & Associates	0.70%	176,439	$3.7M
7	Lakeside Advisors, INC.	0.48%	36,340	$756K
8	Rare Wolf Capital LLC	0.45%	33,864	$704K
9	Spartan Wealth Advisory Services LLC	0.39%	229,666	$4.8M
10	Vested Financial Planning, LLC	0.36%	25,909	$539K
11	Roan Capital Partners	0.34%	19,958	$415K
12	Moneywise, INC.	0.29%	37,859	$787K
13	Amplius Wealth Advisors, LLC	0.16%	107,120	$2.2M
14	Lake Street Private Wealth, LLC	0.16%	67,556	$1.4M
15	Westside Investment Management, Inc.	0.13%	47,000	$978K
16	Daymark Wealth Partners, LLC	0.13%	247,898	$5.2M
17	C M Bidwell & Associates Ltd	0.11%	13,127	$273K
18	Paragon Private Wealth Management, LLC	0.10%	19,068	$397K
19	Condor Capital Management	0.10%	63,782	$1.3M
20	Concurrent Investment Advisors, LLC	0.07%	410,031	$8.5M
21	Liberty Square Wealth Partners LLC	0.07%	14,459	$301K
22	Baker Avenue Asset Management, LP	0.07%	166,062	$3.5M
23	CENTRAL TRUST Co	0.05%	135,384	$2.8M
24	Waverly Advisors, LLC	0.04%	334,757	$7.0M
25	Horst & Graben Wealth Management LLC	0.03%	12,744	$263K

Investor	Ownership History	% of Portfolio	Prev %	Rank	Conviction	Avg Buy Price	13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y	Sell Timing	Shares	Mkt Value	Change	Change %	Source	Quarter	Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Columbia ETF Tr I (MUST)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for MUST?

No change last quarter: The number of hedge funds holding this stock didn't change last quarter. Neither a buying nor selling signal on its own — watch the next quarter for direction.

What is the institutional breadth score for MUST?

More buyers than sellers — 62% buying: Last quarter: 55 funds were net buyers (11 opened a brand new position + 44 added to an existing one). Only 34 were sellers (23 trimmed + 11 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.

What is the fund quality score for MUST holders?

Elite ownership — 72% AUM from top-100 funds: 14 of 85 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 72% of total institutional value in MUST. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held MUST?

55% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 47 out of 85 hedge funds have held MUST for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Is it too late to buy Columbia ETF Tr I (MUST) following the 2026 Q2 hedge fund 13F filings?

As of today, MUST has moved -3.4% since the 2026 Q2 13F filing date (August 14, 2026), compared to -0.7% for the SPY sector ETF — an outperformance of -2.7%. Since the quarter end (June 30, 2026), MUST has gained -5.7% vs +3.3% for SPY. The stock is tracking its sector benchmark closely. The signal remains fresh and the entry point is still near the fund's implied reference.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Market Cap	--
Enterprise Value	--
Trailing P/E	--
Forward P/E	--
PEG Ratio (5yr expected)	--
Price/Sales (ttm)	--
Price/Book (mrq)	--
Enterprise Value/Revenue	--
Enterprise Value/EBITDA	--
Beta (5Y Monthly)	--
Short Ratio (Days to Cover)	--
Short % of Float	--

Profit Margin	--
Return on Assets (ttm)	--
Return on Equity (ttm)	--

Revenue (ttm)	--
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm)	--
Diluted EPS (ttm)	--
Total Cash (mrq)	--
Total Debt/Equity (mrq)	--
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm)	--

Columbia ETF Tr I (MUST)

Smart Money Signals — MUST

No change last quarter

At the ownership peak (100% of max)

Steady growth — +6% more funds vs a year ago

More buyers than sellers — 62% buying

Steady new buyers — ~11 new funds per quarter

55% of holders stayed for 2+ years

Growing discovery — still being found

Veteran-anchored — 59% veterans vs 26% newcomers

Elite ownership — 72% AUM from top-100 funds

Institutional Sentiment Summary — MUST

Hedge Fund Ownership: MUST

Market Analysis: MUST

Analyst Price Targets

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Company Profile: MUST

Is It Too Late to Buy Columbia ETF Tr I (MUST) Based on Hedge Fund 13F Filings?

Hedge Fund Positioning: MUST

Statistics: MUST

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Financial Highlights

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

Frequently Asked Questions — Columbia ETF Tr I (MUST)

Welcome to 13Foresight!