Based on 11 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly
📈
Buying streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds added MSC than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🔻
Below peak — only 69% of 3.0Y high
69% of all-time peak
Only 11 funds hold MSC today versus a peak of 16 funds at 2024 Q2 — just 69% of the maximum. Low institutional ownership can mean the stock is out of favor, but it also means there's a large pool of potential buyers if sentiment turns.
📉
Outflows — 8% fewer funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
1 fewer hedge funds hold MSC compared to a year ago (-8% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🟢
More buyers than sellers — 100% buying
2 buying0 selling
Last quarter: 2 funds were net buyers (1 opened a brand new position + 1 added to an existing one). Only 0 were sellers (0 trimmed + 0 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~1 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 0 → 1 → 1 → 1. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒
82% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 82% conviction (2yr+)
■ 0% medium
■ 18% new
9 out of 11 hedge funds have held MSC for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💎
Buying through price weakness — shares +0%, value -32%
Last quarter: funds added +0% more shares while total portfolio value only changed -32%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~1 new funds/quarter
0 → 0 → 1 → 1 → 1 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 0 → 1 → 1 → 1. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 82% veterans vs 18% newcomers
■ 82% veterans
■ 0% 1-2yr
■ 18% new
Entry-cohort mix of 11 holders: 9 (82%) are 2+ year veterans, 0 entered 1–2 years ago, and 2 (18%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
📋
Smaller funds dominant — 9% AUM from top-100
9% from top-100 AUM funds
4 of 11 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 9% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.
Exit risk score 1.9/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.