Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Tpg Mtg Invts Tr Inc (MITT)

115 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in MITT. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↑ +1
Streak
5Q ▲
Buyers last Q
67%

Smart Money Signals — MITT

Based on 117 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 5 quarters in a row

last 6Q
For 5 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added MITT than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️

At the ownership peak (100% of max)

100% of all-time peak
117 hedge funds hold MITT right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
🚀

Fast accumulation — +31% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
+28 new funds entered over the past year (+31% YoY). That's a rapid rush of institutional money. Fast accumulation often signals a major thesis — but it also means the stock could fall quickly if that thesis breaks.
🟢

More buyers than sellers — 67% buying

80 buying39 selling
Last quarter: 80 funds were net buyers (19 opened a brand new position + 61 added to an existing one). Only 39 were sellers (21 trimmed + 18 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.
⚠️

Fewer new buyers each quarter (-7 vs last Q)

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 16 → 24 → 26 → 19. Each quarter fewer new institutions are entering. This usually means most funds that wanted in are already in — the stock is well-known but the pool of potential new buyers is shrinking.
🔒

54% of holders stayed for 2+ years

■ 54% conviction (2yr+) ■ 22% medium ■ 24% new
63 out of 117 hedge funds have held MITT for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
📈

Growing discovery — still being found

17 → 16 → 24 → 26 → 19 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 16 → 24 → 26 → 19. A growing number of institutions are discovering MITT each quarter. The narrative is still spreading — leaving room for ongoing capital accumulation.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 60% veterans vs 26% newcomers

■ 60% veterans ■ 15% 1-2yr ■ 26% new
Entry-cohort mix of 117 holders: 70 (60%) are 2+ year veterans, 17 entered 1–2 years ago, and 30 (26%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆

Elite ownership — 61% AUM from top-100 funds

61% from top-100 AUM funds
35 of 116 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 61% of total institutional value in MITT. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
4.0
out of 10
Moderate Exit Risk
Exit risk score 4.0/10 — some crowding factors present, but no critical concentration. Watch ownership trend over the next 1–2 quarters for direction.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — MITT

In 2026 Q2, 80 hedge funds were net buyers of MITT (19 opened a new position, 61 added to an existing one), while 39 reduced or exited (21 trimmed, 18 sold completely) — a 67% buyer ratio, indicating clear institutional accumulation. This marks 5 consecutive quarters of net institutional buying — a persistent conviction signal. 61% of total institutional value in MITT is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting elite-tier ownership quality. Net fund flow last quarter: +1 funds (more new holders than closures). Total institutional holders: 117.

Hedge Fund Ownership: MITT

How many hedge funds hold MITT — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of MITT vs. share price

Market Analysis: MITT

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: MITT

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

6 top-rated funds 0 high-conviction
Consensus
3.7
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
0.5
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: MITT
2026 Q3 Stats Unlock in 5 days 115 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in MITT. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q2) Prior (2026 Q1) Change
Funds Holding 115 116 -0.86%
13F Shares 12M 12M 6.56%
Total Value $89M $77M 15.52%
New Positions 19 26 -7
Increased Positions 59 44 +15
Closed Positions 19 19 -
Reduced Positions 21 27 -6
Total Calls 1 2 -50.0%
Total Puts 0 1 -100.0%
PUT/CALL Ratio 0.0 0.5 Bullish

Statistics: MITT

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q3)

115 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in MITT. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
2026 Q3 filings are still coming in. Only funds that have filed so far are shown — top holders may not have reported yet. Full 13F data typically settles by ~50 days after quarter-end.
Top 25 MITT holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 OneAscent Family Office, LLC 0.08% 33,431 $192K
2 Mariner Investment Group LLC 0.05% 48,094 $276K
3 Campbell & CO Investment Adviser LLC 0.01% 35,844 $205K
4 Ullmann Wealth Partners Group, LLC 0.01% 16,569 $95K
5 Denali Advisors LLC 0.01% 14,382 $82K
6 Moors & Cabot, Inc. 0.00% 16,601 $95K
7 Montgomery Financial Services LLC 0.00% 300 $2K
8 Renaissance Technologies LLC 0.00% 171,146 $981K
9 Qube Research & Technologies Ltd 0.00% 199,904 $1.1M
10 Prospera Financial Services Inc 0.00% 11,359 $64K
11 Ieq Capital, LLC 0.00% 28,875 $165K
12 Global Retirement Partners, LLC 0.00% 8,381 $48K
13 Essential Partners LLC 0.00% 190 $1K
14 Inspire Investing, LLC 0.00% 2,000 $11K
15 Voya Investment Management LLC 0.00% 90,529 $519K
16 Ameritas Investment Partners, Inc. 0.00% 2,820 $16K
17 Police & Firemen's Retirement System of New Jersey 0.00% 8,232 $47K
18 GAMMA Investing LLC 0.00% 1,854 $11K
19 Gables Capital Management INC. 0.00% 133 —
20 Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Co 0.00% 211,081 $1.2M
21 UBS Group AG 0.00% 339,399 $1.9M
22 Mml Investors Services, LLC 0.00% 12,750 $73K
23 Strs Ohio 0.00% 7,700 $44K
24 Vanguard Capital Management LLC 0.00% 1,316,400 $7.5M
25 Rhumbline Advisers 0.00% 36,596 $210K
Investor Ownership
History 		% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Tpg Mtg Invts Tr Inc (MITT)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for MITT?

Buying streak — 5 quarters in a row: For 5 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added MITT than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for MITT?

More buyers than sellers — 67% buying: Last quarter: 80 funds were net buyers (19 opened a brand new position + 61 added to an existing one). Only 39 were sellers (21 trimmed + 18 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.

What is the fund quality score for MITT holders?

Elite ownership — 61% AUM from top-100 funds: 35 of 116 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 61% of total institutional value in MITT. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held MITT?

54% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 63 out of 117 hedge funds have held MITT for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →