MAIRS & POWER MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL BOND ETF (MINN): Hedge Fund Ownership & Smart Money Signals (Q4 2025)

MAIRS & POWER MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL BOND ETF (MINN)

24 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in MINN. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Smart Money Signals — MINN

Based on 24 hedge funds · latest filing: 2025 Q4 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 1 quarter in a row

last 6Q

For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds added MINN than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

🏔️

At the ownership peak (100% of max)

100% of all-time peak

24 hedge funds hold MINN right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.

🚀

Fast accumulation — +71% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q

+10 new funds entered over the past year (+71% YoY). That's a rapid rush of institutional money. Fast accumulation often signals a major thesis — but it also means the stock could fall quickly if that thesis breaks.

🟢

More buyers than sellers — 75% buying

15 buying5 selling

Last quarter: 15 funds were net buyers (9 opened a brand new position + 6 added to an existing one). Only 5 were sellers (3 trimmed + 2 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.

📈

More new buyers each quarter (+7 vs last Q)

new funds entering per quarter

Funds opening a new MINN position: 3 → 5 → 2 → 9. A growing influx of new institutional buyers means the asset is still gathering momentum — the consensus hasn't fully saturated yet.

🔒

46% of holders stayed for 2+ years

■ 46% conviction (2yr+) ■ 17% medium ■ 38% new

11 out of 24 hedge funds have held MINN for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

➡️

Steady discovery — ~9 new funds/quarter

4 → 3 → 5 → 2 → 9 new funds/Q

New funds entering each quarter: 3 → 5 → 2 → 9. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.

🏛️

Deep conviction — 42% of holders stayed 2+ years

■ 42% veterans ■ 17% 1-2yr ■ 42% new

Of 24 current holders: 10 (42%) have held for over 2 years without selling. These are not momentum buyers — they have lived through drawdowns and stayed. A large veteran base acts as a stabilizing force during selloffs.

📋

Smaller funds dominant — 2% AUM from top-100

2% from top-100 AUM funds

3 of 24 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 2% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.

4.4

out of 10

Moderate Exit Risk

Exit risk score 4.4/10 — some crowding factors present, but no critical concentration. Watch ownership trend over the next 1–2 quarters for direction.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Metric	All 13F Filers (2025 Q4)	Prior (2025 Q3)	Change
Funds Holding	24	17	41.18%
13F Shares	684K	420K	62.79%
Total Value	$15M	$9M	64.83%
New Positions	9	2	+7
Increased Positions	6	4	+2
Closed Positions	2	5	-3
Reduced Positions	3	3	-
Total Calls	0	0	-
Total Puts	0	0	-
PUT/CALL Ratio	0.0	0.0	Bullish

Metric

All 13F Filers (2025 Q4)

Prior (2025 Q3)

Change

Funds Holding

41.18%

13F Shares

684K

420K

62.79%

Total Value

$15M

$9M

64.83%

New Positions

Increased Positions

Closed Positions

-3

Reduced Positions

Total Calls

Total Puts

PUT/CALL Ratio

0.0

Bullish

Institutional Holders (2026 Q1)

24 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in MINN. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

FILTER:All New Added To Reduced No Change | Overweight >5% | SHOW: Active managers + show index funds

Top 9 institutional holders of MINN — 2025 Q4 · Source: SEC Form 13F
#	Investor	% of Portfolio	Shares	Mkt Value
1	BAYBAN	0.68%	35,298	$781K
2	Winter & Associates, Inc.	0.29%	14,971	$333K
3	OneAscent Financial Services LLC	0.07%	56,858	$1.3M
4	First Heartland Consultants, Inc.	0.03%	17,689	$391K
5	Trust Point Inc.	0.02%	12,000	$266K
6	Cambridge Investment Research Advisors, Inc.	0.00%	17,393	—
7	Kestra Advisory Services, LLC	0.00%	10,036	$222K
8	Farther Finance Advisors, LLC	0.00%	3,576	$79K
9	COMMONWEALTH EQUITY SERVICES, LLC	0.00%	15,205	$336K

Investor	Ownership History	% of Portfolio	Prev %	Rank	Conviction	Avg Buy Price	13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y	Sell Timing	Shares	Mkt Value	Change	Change %	Source	Quarter	Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — MAIRS & POWER MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL BOND ETF (MINN)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for MINN?

Buying streak — 1 quarter in a row: For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds added MINN than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for MINN?

More buyers than sellers — 75% buying: Last quarter: 15 funds were net buyers (9 opened a brand new position + 6 added to an existing one). Only 5 were sellers (3 trimmed + 2 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.

What is the fund quality score for MINN holders?

Smaller funds dominant — 2% AUM from top-100: 3 of 24 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 2% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.

How long have hedge funds held MINN?

46% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 11 out of 24 hedge funds have held MINN for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Market Cap	--
Enterprise Value	--
Trailing P/E	--
Forward P/E	--
PEG Ratio (5yr expected)	--
Price/Sales (ttm)	--
Price/Book (mrq)	--
Enterprise Value/Revenue	--
Enterprise Value/EBITDA	--
Beta (5Y Monthly)	--
Short Ratio (Days to Cover)	--
Short % of Float	--

Profit Margin	--
Return on Assets (ttm)	--
Return on Equity (ttm)	--

Revenue (ttm)	--
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm)	--
Diluted EPS (ttm)	--
Total Cash (mrq)	--
Total Debt/Equity (mrq)	--
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm)	--

MAIRS & POWER MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL BOND ETF (MINN)

Smart Money Signals — MINN

Buying streak — 1 quarter in a row

At the ownership peak (100% of max)

Fast accumulation — +71% more funds vs a year ago

More buyers than sellers — 75% buying

More new buyers each quarter (+7 vs last Q)

46% of holders stayed for 2+ years

Steady discovery — ~9 new funds/quarter

Deep conviction — 42% of holders stayed 2+ years

Smaller funds dominant — 2% AUM from top-100

Hedge Fund Ownership: MINN

Market Analysis: MINN

Analyst Price Targets

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Company Profile: MINN

Hedge Fund Positioning: MINN

Statistics: MINN

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Financial Highlights

Institutional Holders (2026 Q1)

Frequently Asked Questions — MAIRS & POWER MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL BOND ETF (MINN)

Welcome to 13Foresight!