Based on 34 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly
📉
Selling streak — 3 quarters in a row
For 3 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds reduced or closed their MILN positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
📊
High ownership — 74% of 3.0Y peak
74% of all-time peak
34 funds currently hold this stock — 74% of the 3.0-year high of 46 funds (reached 2025 Q2). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
📉
Outflows — 17% fewer funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
7 fewer hedge funds hold MILN compared to a year ago (-17% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🟡
Slight buying edge — 50% buying
17 buying17 selling
Last quarter: 17 funds bought or added vs 17 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~5 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 8 → 4 → 4 → 5. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒
65% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 65% conviction (2yr+)
■ 15% medium
■ 21% new
22 out of 34 hedge funds have held MILN for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💎
Buying through price weakness — shares -16%, value -76%
Last quarter: funds added -16% more shares while total portfolio value only changed -76%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
📊
Peak discovery — momentum slowing
6 → 8 → 4 → 4 → 5 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 8 → 4 → 4 → 5. MILN is well-known in the hedge fund world, but fresh entries are gradually declining. The explosive phase of institutional discovery is likely behind us.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 68% veterans vs 24% newcomers
■ 68% veterans
■ 9% 1-2yr
■ 24% new
Entry-cohort mix of 34 holders: 23 (68%) are 2+ year veterans, 3 entered 1–2 years ago, and 8 (24%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆
Elite ownership — 86% AUM from top-100 funds
86% from top-100 AUM funds
9 of 33 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 86% of total institutional value in MILN. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
Exit risk score 2.2/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.