Based on 13 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly
📉
Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their LZAGY positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
🔻
Below peak — only 68% of 3.0Y high
68% of all-time peak
Only 13 funds hold LZAGY today versus a peak of 19 funds at 2023 Q3 — just 68% of the maximum. Low institutional ownership can mean the stock is out of favor, but it also means there's a large pool of potential buyers if sentiment turns.
📉
Outflows — 7% fewer funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
1 fewer hedge funds hold LZAGY compared to a year ago (-7% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🔴
Heavy selling pressure — only 33% buying
5 buying10 selling
Last quarter: 10 funds sold vs only 5 buyers. This is widespread institutional distribution — not a few funds rebalancing, but a broad exit. High conviction bearish signal.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~1 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 4 → 1 → 4 → 1. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒
54% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 54% conviction (2yr+)
■ 38% medium
■ 8% new
7 out of 13 hedge funds have held LZAGY for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~1 new funds/quarter
2 → 4 → 1 → 4 → 1 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 4 → 1 → 4 → 1. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 62% veterans vs 38% newcomers
■ 62% veterans
■ 0% 1-2yr
■ 38% new
Entry-cohort mix of 13 holders: 8 (62%) are 2+ year veterans, 0 entered 1–2 years ago, and 5 (38%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
📋
Smaller funds dominant — 6% AUM from top-100
6% from top-100 AUM funds
2 of 13 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 6% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.
Exit risk score 2.4/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.