Based on 89 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly
📉
Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their LTPZ positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
📊
High ownership — 93% of 3.0Y peak
93% of all-time peak
89 funds currently hold this stock — 93% of the 3.0-year high of 96 funds (reached 2025 Q4). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
📶
Steady growth — +9% more funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
+7 new funds entered over the past year (+9% YoY). Gradual, steady growth in institutional ownership is generally a healthy signal — not a speculative rush, but consistent conviction.
🟠
More sellers than buyers — 42% buying
42 buying57 selling
Last quarter: 57 funds reduced or exited vs 42 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.
⚠️
Fewer new buyers each quarter (-13 vs last Q)
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 11 → 17 → 27 → 14. Each quarter fewer new institutions are entering. This usually means most funds that wanted in are already in — the stock is well-known but the pool of potential new buyers is shrinking.
🔒
46% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 46% conviction (2yr+)
■ 25% medium
■ 29% new
41 out of 89 hedge funds have held LTPZ for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
📈
Growing discovery — still being found
16 → 11 → 17 → 27 → 14 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 11 → 17 → 27 → 14. A growing number of institutions are discovering LTPZ each quarter. The narrative is still spreading — leaving room for ongoing capital accumulation.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 54% veterans vs 29% newcomers
■ 54% veterans
■ 16% 1-2yr
■ 29% new
Entry-cohort mix of 92 holders: 50 (54%) are 2+ year veterans, 15 entered 1–2 years ago, and 27 (29%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
✅
Strong quality — 22% AUM from major funds
22% from top-100 AUM funds
13 of 87 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, accounting for 22% of total institutional value held. A meaningful share of the ownership value comes from the most well-resourced institutions.
4.1
out of 10
Moderate Exit Risk
Exit risk score 4.1/10 — some crowding factors present, but no critical concentration. Watch ownership trend over the next 1–2 quarters for direction.