Based on 101 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly
📉
Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their LQDH positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
📊
High ownership — 94% of 3.0Y peak
94% of all-time peak
101 funds currently hold this stock — 94% of the 3.0-year high of 107 funds (reached 2025 Q4). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
📶
Steady growth — +6% more funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
+6 new funds entered over the past year (+6% YoY). Gradual, steady growth in institutional ownership is generally a healthy signal — not a speculative rush, but consistent conviction.
🟠
More sellers than buyers — 40% buying
44 buying67 selling
Last quarter: 67 funds reduced or exited vs 44 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~17 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 18 → 16 → 19 → 17. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒
48% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 48% conviction (2yr+)
■ 26% medium
■ 27% new
48 out of 101 hedge funds have held LQDH for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~17 new funds/quarter
19 → 18 → 16 → 19 → 17 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 18 → 16 → 19 → 17. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 55% veterans vs 31% newcomers
■ 55% veterans
■ 14% 1-2yr
■ 31% new
Entry-cohort mix of 101 holders: 56 (55%) are 2+ year veterans, 14 entered 1–2 years ago, and 31 (31%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆
Elite ownership — 41% AUM from top-100 funds
41% from top-100 AUM funds
16 of 101 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 41% of total institutional value in LQDH. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
4.0
out of 10
Moderate Exit Risk
Exit risk score 4.0/10 — some crowding factors present, but no critical concentration. Watch ownership trend over the next 1–2 quarters for direction.