LIND Hedge Fund Ownership (Q2 2026)

Lindblad Expeditions Hldgs I (LIND)

219 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in LIND. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Smart Money Signals — LIND

Based on 223 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 5 quarters in a row

last 6Q

For 5 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added LIND than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

🏔️

At the ownership peak (100% of max)

100% of all-time peak

223 hedge funds hold LIND right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.

🚀

Fast accumulation — +36% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q

+59 new funds entered over the past year (+36% YoY). That's a rapid rush of institutional money. Fast accumulation often signals a major thesis — but it also means the stock could fall quickly if that thesis breaks.

🟢

More buyers than sellers — 63% buying

147 buying88 selling

Last quarter: 147 funds were net buyers (55 opened a brand new position + 92 added to an existing one). Only 88 were sellers (56 trimmed + 32 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.

📈

More new buyers each quarter (+6 vs last Q)

new funds entering per quarter

Funds opening a new LIND position: 27 → 28 → 49 → 55. A growing influx of new institutional buyers means the asset is still gathering momentum — the consensus hasn't fully saturated yet.

🔒

49% of holders stayed for 2+ years

■ 49% conviction (2yr+) ■ 21% medium ■ 30% new

110 out of 223 hedge funds have held LIND for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

💰

Value +83% but shares only +13% — price-driven

Value

+83%

+12%

Last quarter: the total dollar value of institutional holdings rose +83%, but actual share count only changed +13%. The gap is explained by the stock's price rising — not new buying. Strong value growth with weak share growth means the rally is price momentum, not fresh institutional demand.

🚀

Acceleration phase — new buyers rushing in

27 → 27 → 28 → 49 → 55 new funds/Q

New funds entering each quarter: 27 → 28 → 49 → 55. The pace of institutional discovery is accelerating sharply. This is the 'hot idea' phase — the thesis is being passed from fund to fund. You are not late — the accumulation wave is still building.

🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 56% veterans vs 33% newcomers

■ 56% veterans ■ 11% 1-2yr ■ 33% new

Entry-cohort mix of 225 holders: 125 (56%) are 2+ year veterans, 25 entered 1–2 years ago, and 75 (33%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.

🏆

Elite ownership — 56% AUM from top-100 funds

56% from top-100 AUM funds

46 of 222 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 56% of total institutional value in LIND. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

4.2

out of 10

Moderate Exit Risk

Exit risk score 4.2/10 — some crowding factors present, but no critical concentration. Watch ownership trend over the next 1–2 quarters for direction.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Metric	All 13F Filers (2026 Q2)	Prior (2026 Q1)	Change
Funds Holding	219	200	9.5%
13F Shares	52M	48M	9.28%
Total Value	$1.43B	$808M	76.31%
New Positions	54	49	+5
Increased Positions	91	67	+24
Closed Positions	34	34	-
Reduced Positions	55	54	+1
Total Calls	1	1	-
Total Puts	1	0	100%
PUT/CALL Ratio	1.0	0.0	Neutral

Metric

All 13F Filers (2026 Q2)

Prior (2026 Q1)

Change

Funds Holding

219

200

9.5%

13F Shares

52M

48M

9.28%

Total Value

$1.43B

$808M

76.31%

New Positions

Increased Positions

+24

Closed Positions

Reduced Positions

Total Calls

Total Puts

100%

PUT/CALL Ratio

1.0

0.0

Neutral

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

219 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in LIND. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:

FILTER:All New Added To Reduced No Change | Overweight >5%

Top 25 LIND holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
#	Investor	% of Portfolio	Shares	Mkt Value
1	MSD Partners, L.P.	12.77%	347,234	$9.8M
2	Black Diamond Financial, LLC	2.39%	959,964	$27.1M
3	Hedges Asset Management LLC	1.48%	79,800	$2.3M
4	Lisanti Capital Growth, LLC	1.16%	186,940	$5.3M
5	Pier Capital, LLC	1.12%	299,547	$8.5M
6	Formula Growth Ltd	1.11%	111,491	$3.1M
7	Penn Capital Management Company, LLC	1.07%	595,133	$16.8M
8	Bwcp, LP	0.90%	224,203	$6.3M
9	Ariel Investments, LLC	0.78%	2,762,484	$78.0M
10	Intrinsic Edge Capital Management LLC	0.55%	190,000	$5.4M
11	Nicholas Investment Partners, LP	0.54%	339,499	$9.6M
12	Informed Momentum Co LLC	0.53%	208,908	$5.9M
13	Aristides Capital LLC	0.51%	92,345	$2.6M
14	Legato Capital Management LLC	0.35%	151,059	$4.3M
15	North Star Investment Management Corp.	0.31%	204,800	$5.8M
16	Pinnacle Associates Ltd	0.25%	800,048	$22.6M
17	Oberweis Asset Management Inc/	0.25%	420,721	$11.9M
18	Driehaus Capital Management LLC	0.24%	1,467,275	$41.4M
19	Royce & Associates LP	0.24%	1,053,568	$29.8M
20	Voleon Capital Management LP	0.24%	461,246	$13.0M
21	Quent Capital, LLC	0.21%	118,500	$3.3M
22	Select Equity Group, L.P.	0.20%	1,452,792	$41.0M
23	Brasada Capital Management, LP	0.19%	—	$1.1M
24	Balanced Rock Investment Advisors LLC	0.19%	10,614	$300K
25	Granahan Investment Management, LLC	0.17%	173,876	$4.9M

Investor	Ownership History	% of Portfolio	Prev %	Rank	Conviction	Avg Buy Price	13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y	Sell Timing	Shares	Mkt Value	Change	Change %	Source	Quarter	Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Lindblad Expeditions Hldgs I (LIND)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for LIND?

Buying streak — 5 quarters in a row: For 5 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added LIND than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for LIND?

More buyers than sellers — 63% buying: Last quarter: 147 funds were net buyers (55 opened a brand new position + 92 added to an existing one). Only 88 were sellers (56 trimmed + 32 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.

What is the fund quality score for LIND holders?

Elite ownership — 56% AUM from top-100 funds: 46 of 222 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 56% of total institutional value in LIND. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held LIND?

49% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 110 out of 223 hedge funds have held LIND for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Market Cap	--
Enterprise Value	--
Trailing P/E	--
Forward P/E	--
PEG Ratio (5yr expected)	--
Price/Sales (ttm)	--
Price/Book (mrq)	--
Enterprise Value/Revenue	--
Enterprise Value/EBITDA	--
Beta (5Y Monthly)	--
Short Ratio (Days to Cover)	--
Short % of Float	--

Profit Margin	--
Return on Assets (ttm)	--
Return on Equity (ttm)	--

Revenue (ttm)	--
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm)	--
Diluted EPS (ttm)	--
Total Cash (mrq)	--
Total Debt/Equity (mrq)	--
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm)	--

Lindblad Expeditions Hldgs I (LIND)

Smart Money Signals — LIND

Buying streak — 5 quarters in a row

At the ownership peak (100% of max)

Fast accumulation — +36% more funds vs a year ago

More buyers than sellers — 63% buying

More new buyers each quarter (+6 vs last Q)

49% of holders stayed for 2+ years

Value +83% but shares only +13% — price-driven

Acceleration phase — new buyers rushing in

Veteran-anchored — 56% veterans vs 33% newcomers

Elite ownership — 56% AUM from top-100 funds

Institutional Sentiment Summary — LIND

Hedge Fund Ownership: LIND

Market Analysis: LIND

Analyst Price Targets

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Company Profile: LIND

Hedge Fund Positioning: LIND

Statistics: LIND

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Financial Highlights

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

Frequently Asked Questions — Lindblad Expeditions Hldgs I (LIND)

Welcome to 13Foresight!