Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Kura Oncology Inc (KURA)

214 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in KURA. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↑ +1
Streak
4Q ▲
Buyers last Q
56%

Smart Money Signals — KURA

Based on 217 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 4 quarters in a row

last 6Q
For 4 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added KURA than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️

At the ownership peak (100% of max)

100% of all-time peak
217 hedge funds hold KURA right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
📶

Steady growth — +20% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
+36 new funds entered over the past year (+20% YoY). Gradual, steady growth in institutional ownership is generally a healthy signal — not a speculative rush, but consistent conviction.
🟡

Slight buying edge — 56% buying

123 buying96 selling
Last quarter: 123 funds bought or added vs 96 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.
➡️

Steady new buyers — ~33 new funds per quarter

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 44 → 42 → 34 → 33. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒

47% of holders stayed for 2+ years

■ 47% conviction (2yr+) ■ 31% medium ■ 22% new
103 out of 217 hedge funds have held KURA for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💰

Value +51% but shares only +3% — price-driven

Value
+51%
Shares
+3%
Last quarter: the total dollar value of institutional holdings rose +51%, but actual share count only changed +3%. The gap is explained by the stock's price rising — not new buying. Strong value growth with weak share growth means the rally is price momentum, not fresh institutional demand.
📊

Peak discovery — momentum slowing

28 → 44 → 42 → 34 → 33 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 44 → 42 → 34 → 33. KURA is well-known in the hedge fund world, but fresh entries are gradually declining. The explosive phase of institutional discovery is likely behind us.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 57% veterans vs 26% newcomers

■ 57% veterans ■ 17% 1-2yr ■ 26% new
Entry-cohort mix of 223 holders: 126 (57%) are 2+ year veterans, 38 entered 1–2 years ago, and 59 (26%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆

Elite ownership — 47% AUM from top-100 funds

47% from top-100 AUM funds
46 of 216 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 47% of total institutional value in KURA. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
3.7
out of 10
Low Exit Risk
Exit risk score 3.7/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — KURA

In 2026 Q2, 123 hedge funds were net buyers of KURA (33 opened a new position, 90 added to an existing one), while 96 reduced or exited (64 trimmed, 32 sold completely) — a 56% buyer ratio, indicating a slight buying edge. This marks 4 consecutive quarters of net institutional buying — a persistent conviction signal. 47% of total institutional value in KURA is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting elite-tier ownership quality. Net fund flow last quarter: +1 funds (more new holders than closures). Total institutional holders: 217.

Hedge Fund Ownership: KURA

How many hedge funds hold KURA — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of KURA vs. share price

Market Analysis: KURA

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: KURA

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

10 top-rated funds 2 high-conviction
Consensus
4.5
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
2.4
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: KURA
214 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in KURA. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q2) Prior (2026 Q1) Change
Funds Holding 214 216 -0.93%
13F Shares 87M 85M 2.12%
Total Value $946M $687M 37.6%
New Positions 33 34 -1
Increased Positions 87 68 +19
Closed Positions 34 29 +5
Reduced Positions 63 81 -18
Total Calls 4 4 -
Total Puts 3 4 -25.0%
PUT/CALL Ratio 0.75 1.0 Neutral

Statistics: KURA

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

214 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in KURA. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 KURA holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Alethea Capital Management, LLC 9.85% 2,167,938 $23.8M
2 Prosight Management, LP 3.82% 2,021,964 $22.2M
3 Ally Bridge Group (NY) LLC 2.81% 290,000 $3.2M
4 Lion Point Capital, LP 2.41% 46,000 $505K
5 Bvf Inc/Il 2.37% 8,445,769 $92.7M
6 Ishara Investments LP 2.23% 276,750 $3.0M
7 Montanova Capital, LLC 1.72% 8,575,422 $94.1M
8 1492 Capital Management LLC 1.51% 467,153 $5.1M
9 NAN FUNG TRINITY (HK) Ltd 1.27% 1,174,880 $12.9M
10 Sector Gamma As 1.03% 433,012 $4.8M
11 Rangeley Capital, LLC 0.94% 94,000 $1.0M
12 Act Capital Management, LLC 0.64% 88,900 $975K
13 Rhenman & Partners Asset Management AB 0.61% 591,500 $6.5M
14 Sectoral Asset Management Inc 0.55% 71,480 $784K
15 Armistice Capital, LLC 0.49% 3,678,000 $40.3M
16 nVerses Capital, LLC 0.44% 26,023 $285K
17 Sphera Funds Management LTD. 0.42% 295,039 $3.2M
18 Rosalind Advisors, Inc. 0.41% 100,000 $1.1M
19 Virtus Investment Advisers, LLC 0.33% 128,495 $1.4M
20 Deep Track Capital, LP 0.32% 1,978,565 $21.7M
21 Knott David M Jr 0.31% 52,767 $579K
22 DAFNA Capital Management LLC 0.25% 120,568 $1.3M
23 Xcel Wealth Management, LLC 0.24% 90,983 $998K
24 Pavaki Capital Management LLC 0.22% 30,000 $312K
25 Hennion & Walsh Asset Management, Inc. 0.18% 568,845 $6.2M
Investor Ownership
History 		% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Kura Oncology Inc (KURA)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for KURA?

Buying streak — 4 quarters in a row: For 4 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added KURA than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for KURA?

Slight buying edge — 56% buying: Last quarter: 123 funds bought or added vs 96 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.

What is the fund quality score for KURA holders?

Elite ownership — 47% AUM from top-100 funds: 46 of 216 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 47% of total institutional value in KURA. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held KURA?

47% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 103 out of 217 hedge funds have held KURA for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →