Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Aim ETF Products Trust (JUNW)

37 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in JUNW. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
→ 0
Streak
1Q —
Buyers last Q
33%

Smart Money Signals — JUNW

Based on 37 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly

➡️

No change last quarter

last 6Q
The number of hedge funds holding this stock didn't change last quarter. Neither a buying nor selling signal on its own — watch the next quarter for direction.
📊

High ownership — 88% of 3.0Y peak

88% of all-time peak
37 funds currently hold this stock — 88% of the 3.0-year high of 42 funds (reached 2024 Q2). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
📉

Outflows — 10% fewer funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
4 fewer hedge funds hold JUNW compared to a year ago (-10% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🔴

Heavy selling pressure — only 33% buying

9 buying18 selling
Last quarter: 18 funds sold vs only 9 buyers. This is widespread institutional distribution — not a few funds rebalancing, but a broad exit. High conviction bearish signal.
➡️

Steady new buyers — ~2 new funds per quarter

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 9 → 3 → 5 → 2. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
📌

Mixed — 32% long-term, 14% new

■ 32% conviction (2yr+) ■ 54% medium ■ 14% new
Of the 37 current holders: 12 (32%) held >2 years, 20 held 1–2 years, and 5 entered in the last year. A mixed base — the stock has long-term believers but also recent buyers who haven't been tested by a downturn yet.
⚠️

Saturation — most institutions already know this story

6 → 9 → 3 → 5 → 2 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 9 → 3 → 5 → 2. Far fewer institutions are entering now vs. a year ago. When the pool of potential new buyers shrinks this fast, future price support from institutional inflows weakens significantly.
📊

Mixed cohorts — 35% veterans, 27% new entrants

■ 35% veterans ■ 38% 1-2yr ■ 27% new
Of 37 current holders: 13 (35%) held 2+ years, 14 held 1–2 years, 10 (27%) entered in the past year. Balanced distribution — some institutional memory, some recent momentum buyers.
📋

Smaller funds dominant — 16% AUM from top-100

16% from top-100 AUM funds
5 of 37 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 16% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.
3.6
out of 10
Low Exit Risk
Exit risk score 3.6/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — JUNW

In 2026 Q1, 9 hedge funds were net buyers of JUNW (2 opened a new position, 7 added to an existing one), while 18 reduced or exited (16 trimmed, 2 sold completely) — a 33% buyer ratio, indicating net institutional distribution. Net fund flow last quarter: flat (entries and exits balanced). Total institutional holders: 37.

Hedge Fund Ownership: JUNW

How many hedge funds hold JUNW — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of JUNW vs. share price

Market Analysis: JUNW

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: JUNW

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Is It Too Late to Buy Aim ETF Products Trust (JUNW) Based on Hedge Fund 13F Filings?

Signal Freshness measures how much JUNW has moved relative to its sector benchmark (SPY) since the 2026 Q1 13F filing. A stock that has barely outrun its sector is still a relatively fresh entry point — the fund's thesis has not yet been priced in by the broader market.

Since Quarter End March 31, 2026 · 83d ago
JUNW
+3.0%
SPY
+15.1%

JUNW outperformed SPY by -12.1% since March 31, 2026.

Since 13F Filing Date May 15, 2026 · 38d ago
JUNW
+0.1%
SPY
+1.3%

Since the filing became public, JUNW outperformed SPY by -1.2% .

Interpretation: The stock is tracking its sector benchmark closely. The signal remains fresh and the entry point is still near the fund's implied reference. Learn more →

Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

1 top-rated funds 0 high-conviction
Consensus
1.3
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
0.6
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: JUNW
37 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in JUNW. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q1) Prior (2025 Q4) Change
Funds Holding 37 37 -
13F Shares 1M 1M -8.31%
Total Value $42M $46M -9.59%
New Positions 2 5 -3
Increased Positions 7 5 +2
Closed Positions 2 3 -1
Reduced Positions 16 15 +1
Total Calls 0 0 -
Total Puts 0 0 -
PUT/CALL Ratio 0.0 0.0 Bullish

Statistics: JUNW

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q1)

37 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in JUNW. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 JUNW holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q1 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 American Asset Management INC. 5.00% 172,754 $5.8M
2 Barnes Dennig Private Wealth Management LLC 0.52% 15,809 $527K
3 Grantvest Financial Group LLC 0.40% 18,759 $626K
4 Stonebridge Financial Group, LLC / MO 0.36% 12,800 $427K
5 Jim Saulnier & Associates, LLC 0.31% 19,376 $646K
6 Wealthgarden F.S. LLC 0.16% 7,028 $234K
7 Joseph P. Lucia & Associates, LLC 0.12% 10,355 $345K
8 Aspire Capital Advisors LLC 0.09% 11,725 $391K
9 Castle Rock Wealth Management, LLC 0.09% 11,816 $395K
10 TAGStone Capital, Inc. 0.08% 7,205 $240K
11 Allianz Se 0.06% 159,439 $5.3M
12 Spire Wealth Management 0.04% 38,001 $1.3M
13 Centaurus Financial, INC. 0.03% 18,585 $620K
14 Elevated Capital Advisors, LLC 0.02% 2,370 $79K
15 PFG Advisors 0.02% 9,301 $310K
16 Focus Financial Network, Inc. 0.01% 10,783 $360K
17 Nbc Securities, INC. 0.01% 5,103 $170K
18 Farther Finance Advisors, LLC 0.01% 35,450 $1.2M
19 World Investment Advisors 0.01% 18,900 $630K
20 Harbour Investments, INC. 0.01% 19,181 $640K
21 Kestra Advisory Services, LLC 0.01% 68,747 $2.3M
22 Independent Financial Group, LLC 0.01% 6,850 $228K
23 Commonwealth Equity Services, LLC 0.01% 120,344 $4.0M
24 Osaic Holdings, INC. 0.00% 102,312 $3.4M
25 Old Mission Capital LLC 0.00% 9,389 $313K
Investor Ownership
History 		% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Aim ETF Products Trust (JUNW)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for JUNW?

No change last quarter: The number of hedge funds holding this stock didn't change last quarter. Neither a buying nor selling signal on its own — watch the next quarter for direction.

What is the institutional breadth score for JUNW?

Heavy selling pressure — only 33% buying: Last quarter: 18 funds sold vs only 9 buyers. This is widespread institutional distribution — not a few funds rebalancing, but a broad exit. High conviction bearish signal.

What is the fund quality score for JUNW holders?

Smaller funds dominant — 16% AUM from top-100: 5 of 37 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 16% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.

How long have hedge funds held JUNW?

Mixed — 32% long-term, 14% new: Of the 37 current holders: 12 (32%) held >2 years, 20 held 1–2 years, and 5 entered in the last year. A mixed base — the stock has long-term believers but also recent buyers who haven't been tested by a downturn yet.

Is it too late to buy Aim ETF Products Trust (JUNW) following the 2026 Q1 hedge fund 13F filings?

As of today, JUNW has moved +0.1% since the 2026 Q1 13F filing date (May 15, 2026), compared to +1.3% for the SPY sector ETF — an outperformance of -1.2%. Since the quarter end (March 31, 2026), JUNW has gained +3.0% vs +15.1% for SPY. The stock is tracking its sector benchmark closely. The signal remains fresh and the entry point is still near the fund's implied reference.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →