Based on 13 hedge funds · latest filing: 2025 Q4 · updated quarterly
📈
Buying streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds added JANJ than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
📊
High ownership — 87% of 2.0Y peak
87% of all-time peak
13 funds currently hold this stock — 87% of the 2.0-year high of 15 funds (reached 2024 Q4). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
📉
Outflows — 13% fewer funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
2 fewer hedge funds hold JANJ compared to a year ago (-13% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🟢
More buyers than sellers — 62% buying
8 buying5 selling
Last quarter: 8 funds were net buyers (6 opened a brand new position + 2 added to an existing one). Only 5 were sellers (3 trimmed + 2 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.
📈
More new buyers each quarter (+6 vs last Q)
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening a new JANJ position: 2 → 2 → 0 → 6. A growing influx of new institutional buyers means the asset is still gathering momentum — the consensus hasn't fully saturated yet.
🔄
Mostly new holders — 38% entered in last year
■ 0% conviction (2yr+)
■ 62% medium
■ 38% new
Only 0 funds (0%) have held >2 years. The majority of current holders are relatively new to the position. New holders tend to sell faster when prices drop — a shallow conviction base that could amplify any sell-off.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~6 new funds/quarter
3 → 2 → 2 → 0 → 6 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 2 → 2 → 0 → 6. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
📊
Mixed cohorts — 0% veterans, 54% new entrants
■ 0% veterans
■ 46% 1-2yr
■ 54% new
Of 13 current holders: 0 (0%) held 2+ years, 6 held 1–2 years, 7 (54%) entered in the past year. Balanced distribution — some institutional memory, some recent momentum buyers.
📋
Smaller funds dominant — 0% AUM from top-100
0% from top-100 AUM funds
1 of 13 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 0% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.
Exit risk score 3.3/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.