Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Neos ETF Trust (IWMI)

112 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in IWMI. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Fetching live quote...
Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↑ +29
Streak
8Q ▲
Buyers last Q
81%

Smart Money Signals — IWMI

Based on 114 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 8 quarters in a row

last 6Q
For 8 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added IWMI than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️

At the ownership peak (100% of max)

100% of all-time peak
114 hedge funds hold IWMI right now — the highest count in 2.2 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
🚀

Fast accumulation — +235% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
+80 new funds entered over the past year (+235% YoY). That's a rapid rush of institutional money. Fast accumulation often signals a major thesis — but it also means the stock could fall quickly if that thesis breaks.
🟢

More buyers than sellers — 81% buying

92 buying22 selling
Last quarter: 92 funds were net buyers (38 opened a brand new position + 54 added to an existing one). Only 22 were sellers (13 trimmed + 9 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.
📈

More new buyers each quarter (+11 vs last Q)

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening a new IWMI position: 15 → 24 → 27 → 38. A growing influx of new institutional buyers means the asset is still gathering momentum — the consensus hasn't fully saturated yet.
🔄

Mostly new holders — 66% entered in last year

1% conviction (2yr+) 33% medium 66% new
Only 1 funds (1%) have held >2 years. The majority of current holders are relatively new to the position. New holders tend to sell faster when prices drop — a shallow conviction base that could amplify any sell-off.
💰

Value +52% but shares only +36% — price-driven

Value
+51%
Shares
+35%
Last quarter: the total dollar value of institutional holdings rose +52%, but actual share count only changed +36%. The gap is explained by the stock's price rising — not new buying. Strong value growth with weak share growth means the rally is price momentum, not fresh institutional demand.
🚀

Acceleration phase — new buyers rushing in

15 → 15 → 24 → 27 → 38 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 15 → 24 → 27 → 38. The pace of institutional discovery is accelerating sharply. This is the 'hot idea' phase — the thesis is being passed from fund to fund. You are not late — the accumulation wave is still building.
🌱

Early stage — 79% of holders entered in last year

0% veterans 21% 1-2yr 79% new
Of 118 current holders: 93 (79%) entered in the past year, only 0 (0%) are 2+ year veterans. This is an early-phase institutional idea — still being discovered. High upside potential if the thesis plays out, but thin conviction base.

Strong quality — 32% AUM from major funds

32% from top-100 AUM funds
10 of 112 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, accounting for 32% of total institutional value held. A meaningful share of the ownership value comes from the most well-resourced institutions.
6.6
out of 10
Moderate Exit Risk
Exit risk score 6.6/10 — some crowding factors present, but no critical concentration. Watch ownership trend over the next 1–2 quarters for direction.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — IWMI

In 2026 Q2, 92 hedge funds were net buyers of IWMI (38 opened a new position, 54 added to an existing one), while 22 reduced or exited (13 trimmed, 9 sold completely) — a 81% buyer ratio, indicating clear institutional accumulation. This marks 8 consecutive quarters of net institutional buying — a persistent conviction signal. 32% of total institutional value in IWMI is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting strong institutional quality. Net fund flow last quarter: +29 funds (more new holders than closures). Total institutional holders: 114.

Hedge Fund Ownership: IWMI

How many hedge funds hold IWMI — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of IWMI vs. share price

Market Analysis: IWMI

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: IWMI

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

2 top-rated funds 1 high-conviction
Consensus
2.1
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
2.2
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: IWMI
112 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in IWMI. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q2) Prior (2026 Q1) Change
Funds Holding 112 85 31.76%
13F Shares 3M 3M 35.51%
Total Value $185M $122M 51.84%
New Positions 38 27 +11
Increased Positions 53 43 +10
Closed Positions 9 2 +7
Reduced Positions 12 10 +2
Total Calls 3 2 50.0%
Total Puts 3 1 200.0%
PUT/CALL Ratio 1.0 0.5 Neutral

Statistics: IWMI

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

112 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in IWMI. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 IWMI holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 MADDEN SECURITIES Corp 3.91% 263,232 $14.1M
2 Cascade Wealth Advisors, Inc 2.66% 124,435 $6.6M
3 Palacios Wealth Management, LLC 1.96% 62,100 $3.3M
4 Marshall & Sterling Wealth Advisors Inc. 1.81% 57,258 $3.1M
5 Owen LaRue, LLC 1.51% 81,072 $4.3M
6 Independence Wealth Advisors, LLC 1.47% 54,710 $2.9M
7 Prevail Innovative Wealth Advisors, LLC 1.40% 175,355 $9.4M
8 Herbst Group, LLC 0.91% 31,151 $1.7M
9 FSA Advisors, Inc. 0.61% 24,916 $1.3M
10 Garden State Investment Advisory Services LLC 0.58% 60,325 $3.2M
11 Seaview Investment Managers LLC 0.38% 23,887 $1.3M
12 High Net Worth Advisory Group LLC 0.36% 31,258 $1.7M
13 Vann Equity Management LLC 0.34% 10,499 $562K
14 Entrewealth, LLC 0.29% 15,000 $791K
15 Navis Wealth Advisors, LLC 0.25% 12,512 $670K
16 Advisory Advocates, LLC 0.20% 4,439 $238K
17 Brookwood Investment Group LLC 0.16% 26,256 $1.4M
18 PSI Advisors, LLC 0.16% 12,508 $669K
19 World Equity Group, INC. 0.13% 10,590 $567K
20 Gradient Investments LLC 0.12% 165,461 $8.9M
21 NFSG Corp 0.12% 18,391 $984K
22 CAP Partners, LLC 0.11% 4,298 $230K
23 Capital Investment Advisory Services, LLC 0.11% 33,157 $1.8M
24 Quantum Private Wealth, LLC 0.10% 7,226 $387K
25 SeaCrest Wealth Management, LLC 0.09% 14,500 $776K
Investor Ownership
History
% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Neos ETF Trust (IWMI)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for IWMI?

Buying streak — 8 quarters in a row: For 8 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added IWMI than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for IWMI?

More buyers than sellers — 81% buying: Last quarter: 92 funds were net buyers (38 opened a brand new position + 54 added to an existing one). Only 22 were sellers (13 trimmed + 9 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.

What is the fund quality score for IWMI holders?

Strong quality — 32% AUM from major funds: 10 of 112 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, accounting for 32% of total institutional value held. A meaningful share of the ownership value comes from the most well-resourced institutions.

How long have hedge funds held IWMI?

Mostly new holders — 66% entered in last year: Only 1 funds (1%) have held >2 years. The majority of current holders are relatively new to the position. New holders tend to sell faster when prices drop — a shallow conviction base that could amplify any sell-off.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →