Based on 10 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly
📈
Buying streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds added HUBCW than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🔻
Below peak — only 45% of 3.0Y high
45% of all-time peak
Only 10 funds hold HUBCW today versus a peak of 22 funds at 2023 Q3 — just 45% of the maximum. Low institutional ownership can mean the stock is out of favor, but it also means there's a large pool of potential buyers if sentiment turns.
📉
Outflows — 17% fewer funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
2 fewer hedge funds hold HUBCW compared to a year ago (-17% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🟡
Slight buying edge — 50% buying
3 buying3 selling
Last quarter: 3 funds bought or added vs 3 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~3 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 1 → 0 → 1 → 3. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒
80% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 80% conviction (2yr+)
■ 20% medium
■ 0% new
8 out of 10 hedge funds have held HUBCW for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💰
Value +1410% but shares only +10% — price-driven
Last quarter: the total dollar value of institutional holdings rose +1410%, but actual share count only changed +10%. The gap is explained by the stock's price rising — not new buying. Strong value growth with weak share growth means the rally is price momentum, not fresh institutional demand.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~3 new funds/quarter
2 → 1 → 0 → 1 → 3 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 1 → 0 → 1 → 3. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 80% veterans vs 10% newcomers
■ 80% veterans
■ 10% 1-2yr
■ 10% new
Entry-cohort mix of 10 holders: 8 (80%) are 2+ year veterans, 1 entered 1–2 years ago, and 1 (10%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
📋
Smaller funds dominant — 5% AUM from top-100
5% from top-100 AUM funds
3 of 9 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 5% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.
Exit risk score 1.0/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.