Based on 59 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly
📉
Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their HRZN positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
📊
High ownership — 79% of 3.0Y peak
79% of all-time peak
59 funds currently hold this stock — 79% of the 3.0-year high of 75 funds (reached 2024 Q4). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
📉
Outflows — 6% fewer funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
4 fewer hedge funds hold HRZN compared to a year ago (-6% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🟠
More sellers than buyers — 44% buying
31 buying40 selling
Last quarter: 40 funds reduced or exited vs 31 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~13 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 15 → 12 → 16 → 13. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒
47% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 47% conviction (2yr+)
■ 34% medium
■ 19% new
28 out of 59 hedge funds have held HRZN for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💎
Buying through price weakness — shares -18%, value -47%
Last quarter: funds added -18% more shares while total portfolio value only changed -47%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~13 new funds/quarter
11 → 15 → 12 → 16 → 13 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 15 → 12 → 16 → 13. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 57% veterans vs 28% newcomers
■ 57% veterans
■ 15% 1-2yr
■ 28% new
Entry-cohort mix of 60 holders: 34 (57%) are 2+ year veterans, 9 entered 1–2 years ago, and 17 (28%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
✅
Strong quality — 24% AUM from major funds
24% from top-100 AUM funds
11 of 57 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, accounting for 24% of total institutional value held. A meaningful share of the ownership value comes from the most well-resourced institutions.
Exit risk score 2.7/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.