Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Hims & Hers Health Inc (HIMS)

499 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in HIMS. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↑ +79
Streak
1Q ▲
Buyers last Q
61%

Smart Money Signals — HIMS

Based on 518 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 1 quarter in a row

last 6Q
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds added HIMS than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️

At the ownership peak (99% of max)

99% of all-time peak
518 hedge funds hold HIMS right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
〰️

Stable — ownership unchanged year-over-year

fund count last 6Q
The number of hedge funds holding HIMS is almost the same as a year ago (-5 funds, -1% change). No significant rush to buy or sell — institutional backing is holding steady.
🟢

More buyers than sellers — 61% buying

345 buying218 selling
Last quarter: 345 funds were net buyers (153 opened a brand new position + 192 added to an existing one). Only 218 were sellers (144 trimmed + 74 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.
📈

More new buyers each quarter (+63 vs last Q)

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening a new HIMS position: 103 → 98 → 90 → 153. A growing influx of new institutional buyers means the asset is still gathering momentum — the consensus hasn't fully saturated yet.
📌

Mixed — 34% long-term, 30% new

■ 34% conviction (2yr+) ■ 36% medium ■ 30% new
Of the 518 current holders: 177 (34%) held >2 years, 184 held 1–2 years, and 157 entered in the last year. A mixed base — the stock has long-term believers but also recent buyers who haven't been tested by a downturn yet.
💰

Value +83% but shares only +9% — price-driven

Value
+82%
Shares
+9%
Last quarter: the total dollar value of institutional holdings rose +83%, but actual share count only changed +9%. The gap is explained by the stock's price rising — not new buying. Strong value growth with weak share growth means the rally is price momentum, not fresh institutional demand.
📈

Growing discovery — still being found

148 → 103 → 98 → 90 → 153 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 103 → 98 → 90 → 153. A growing number of institutions are discovering HIMS each quarter. The narrative is still spreading — leaving room for ongoing capital accumulation.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 40% veterans vs 34% newcomers

■ 40% veterans ■ 25% 1-2yr ■ 34% new
Entry-cohort mix of 580 holders: 233 (40%) are 2+ year veterans, 147 entered 1–2 years ago, and 200 (34%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆

Elite ownership — 61% AUM from top-100 funds

61% from top-100 AUM funds
56 of 504 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 61% of total institutional value in HIMS. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
3.7
out of 10
Low Exit Risk
Exit risk score 3.7/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — HIMS

In 2026 Q2, 345 hedge funds were net buyers of HIMS (153 opened a new position, 192 added to an existing one), while 218 reduced or exited (144 trimmed, 74 sold completely) — a 61% buyer ratio, indicating clear institutional accumulation. 61% of total institutional value in HIMS is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting elite-tier ownership quality. Net fund flow last quarter: +79 funds (more new holders than closures). Total institutional holders: 518.

Hedge Fund Ownership: HIMS

How many hedge funds hold HIMS — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of HIMS vs. share price

Market Analysis: HIMS

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: HIMS

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

23 top-rated funds 6 high-conviction
Consensus
6.0
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
5.0
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: HIMS
499 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in HIMS. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q2) Prior (2026 Q1) Change
Funds Holding 499 439 13.67%
13F Shares 220M 209M 5.2%
Total Value $7.63B $4.30B 77.39%
New Positions 152 90 +62
Increased Positions 179 159 +20
Closed Positions 78 137 -59
Reduced Positions 130 139 -9
Total Calls 42 24 75.0%
Total Puts 34 29 17.24%
PUT/CALL Ratio 0.81 1.21 Neutral

Statistics: HIMS

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

499 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in HIMS. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 HIMS holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Foresite Capital Management V, LLC 7.07% 738,151 $25.6M
2 Metavasi Capital LP 6.61% 546,429 $18.9M
3 FirstWave Capital Management LLC 5.20% 339,978 $11.8M
4 Divisadero Street Capital Management, LP 4.72% 6,009,505 $208.3M
5 REX Advisers, LLC 4.12% 52,600 $1.8M
6 Potrero Capital Research LLC 4.10% 212,944 $7.4M
7 Greenfield Seitz Capital Management, LLC 3.80% 368,339 $12.8M
8 Bienville Capital Management, LLC 3.63% 785,739 $27.2M
9 Bridger Management, LLC 2.77% 119,865 $4.2M
10 Kelly Lawrence W & Associates Inc/Ca 2.46% 332,275 $11.5M
11 Kingdon Capital Management, L.L.C. 1.93% 542,500 $18.8M
12 Eddie Patel Inc 1.72% 82,773 $2.9M
13 Udine Wealth Management, INC. 1.51% 105,638 $3.7M
14 Casdin Capital, LLC 1.21% 700,000 $24.3M
15 Nicholas Wealth, LLC. 1.12% 58,864 $2.0M
16 Kurv Investment Management LLC 1.08% 51,865 $1.8M
17 Creek Drive Management Group LLC 0.98% 58,500 $2.0M
18 Philosophy Capital Management LLC 0.94% 570,802 $19.8M
19 Diadema Partners LP 0.88% 200,000 $6.9M
20 Diadema Partners LP 0.85% 193,700 $6.7M
21 Ikarian Capital, LLC 0.70% 188,381 $6.5M
22 Lake Street Private Wealth, LLC 0.70% 177,348 $6.1M
23 Elevatus Welath Management 0.67% 79,161 $2.7M
24 Winnacle Wealth LLC 0.52% 22,210 $770K
25 Olympiad Research LP 0.51% 7,066 $245K
Investor Ownership
History 		% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Hims & Hers Health Inc (HIMS)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for HIMS?

Buying streak — 1 quarter in a row: For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds added HIMS than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for HIMS?

More buyers than sellers — 61% buying: Last quarter: 345 funds were net buyers (153 opened a brand new position + 192 added to an existing one). Only 218 were sellers (144 trimmed + 74 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.

What is the fund quality score for HIMS holders?

Elite ownership — 61% AUM from top-100 funds: 56 of 504 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 61% of total institutional value in HIMS. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held HIMS?

Mixed — 34% long-term, 30% new: Of the 518 current holders: 177 (34%) held >2 years, 184 held 1–2 years, and 157 entered in the last year. A mixed base — the stock has long-term believers but also recent buyers who haven't been tested by a downturn yet.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →