Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Gitlab Inc (GTLB)

364 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in GTLB. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↓ -64
Streak
1Q ▼
Buyers last Q
52%

Smart Money Signals — GTLB

Based on 366 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly

📉

Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row

last 6Q
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their GTLB positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
📊

High ownership — 85% of 3.0Y peak

85% of all-time peak
366 funds currently hold this stock — 85% of the 3.0-year high of 430 funds (reached 2025 Q2). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
📉

Outflows — 14% fewer funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
62 fewer hedge funds hold GTLB compared to a year ago (-14% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🟡

Slight buying edge — 52% buying

242 buying226 selling
Last quarter: 242 funds bought or added vs 226 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.
⚠️

Fewer new buyers each quarter (-36 vs last Q)

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 90 → 89 → 107 → 71. Each quarter fewer new institutions are entering. This usually means most funds that wanted in are already in — the stock is well-known but the pool of potential new buyers is shrinking.
🔒

46% of holders stayed for 2+ years

■ 46% conviction (2yr+) ■ 29% medium ■ 25% new
167 out of 366 hedge funds have held GTLB for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💎

Buying through price weakness — shares -2%, value -44%

Value
-43%
Shares
-2%
Last quarter: funds added -2% more shares while total portfolio value only changed -44%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
➡️

Steady discovery — ~71 new funds/quarter

99 → 90 → 89 → 107 → 71 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 90 → 89 → 107 → 71. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 54% veterans vs 30% newcomers

■ 54% veterans ■ 16% 1-2yr ■ 30% new
Entry-cohort mix of 401 holders: 217 (54%) are 2+ year veterans, 64 entered 1–2 years ago, and 120 (30%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
✅

Strong quality — 38% AUM from major funds

38% from top-100 AUM funds
54 of 362 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, accounting for 38% of total institutional value held. A meaningful share of the ownership value comes from the most well-resourced institutions.
2.9
out of 10
Low Exit Risk
Exit risk score 2.9/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — GTLB

In 2026 Q1, 242 hedge funds were net buyers of GTLB (71 opened a new position, 171 added to an existing one), while 226 reduced or exited (91 trimmed, 135 sold completely) — a 52% buyer ratio, indicating a slight buying edge. 38% of total institutional value in GTLB is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting strong institutional quality. Net fund flow last quarter: -64 funds (more exits than new entries). Total institutional holders: 366.

Hedge Fund Ownership: GTLB

How many hedge funds hold GTLB — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of GTLB vs. share price

Market Analysis: GTLB

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: GTLB

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Is It Too Late to Buy Gitlab Inc (GTLB) Based on Hedge Fund 13F Filings?

Signal Freshness measures how much GTLB has moved relative to its sector benchmark (XLK) since the 2026 Q1 13F filing. A stock that has barely outrun its sector is still a relatively fresh entry point — the fund's thesis has not yet been priced in by the broader market.

Since Quarter End March 31, 2026 · 74d ago
GTLB
+28.4%
XLK
+37.9%

GTLB outperformed XLK by -9.5% since March 31, 2026.

Since 13F Filing Date May 15, 2026 · 29d ago
GTLB
+17.5%
XLK
+3.9%

Since the filing became public, GTLB outperformed XLK by +13.6% .

Interpretation: The stock has meaningfully outrun its sector. The trade has partially played out; entry is at a premium to the fund's implied reference. Learn more →

Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

30 top-rated funds 6 high-conviction
Consensus
6.5
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
4.8
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: GTLB
364 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in GTLB. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q1) Prior (2025 Q4) Change
Funds Holding 364 430 -15.35%
13F Shares 150M 154M -2.46%
Total Value $3.17B $5.62B -43.64%
New Positions 69 107 -38
Increased Positions 163 153 +10
Closed Positions 135 101 +34
Reduced Positions 80 126 -46
Total Calls 24 26 -7.69%
Total Puts 15 21 -28.57%
PUT/CALL Ratio 0.62 0.81 Bullish

Statistics: GTLB

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q1)

364 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in GTLB. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 GTLB holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q1 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 General Catalyst Group Management, LLC 10.86% 921,405 $19.9M
2 TFJ Management, LLC 9.29% 606,720 $13.1M
3 HMI Capital Management, L.P. 7.61% 2,651,677 $57.4M
4 Impactive Capital LP 6.14% 3,914,996 $84.7M
5 Infinitum Asset Management, LLC 6.08% 2,250,000 $48.7M
6 Technology Crossover Management X, Ltd. 5.32% 1,922,114 $41.6M
7 Light Street Capital Management, LLC 4.74% 1,170,000 $25.3M
8 Ancient Art, L.P. 3.54% 750,000 $16.2M
9 Lane Generational LLC 3.14% 182,575 $4.0M
10 Stadium Capital Management LLC 2.38% 44,683 $967K
11 Barton Investment Management 1.51% 554,943 $12.0M
12 Alphabet Inc. 1.47% 2,724,712 $59.0M
13 Deltroit Asset Management (UK) LLP 1.44% 414,500 $9.0M
14 Watershed Asset Management, L.L.C. 1.44% 64,000 $1.4M
15 Monimus Capital Management, LP 1.40% 233,122 $5.0M
16 LB Partners LLC 1.16% 60,000 $1.3M
17 Ceera Investments, LLC 1.11% 117,449 $2.5M
18 Brooktree Capital Management 1.09% 63,471 $1.4M
19 Champlain Investment Partners, LLC 1.05% 3,810,238 $82.5M
20 Harber Asset Management LLC 0.75% 54,000 $1.2M
21 Taylor Frigon Capital Management LLC 0.71% 57,714 $1.2M
22 Edmond de Rothschild Holding S.A. 0.65% 2,082,623 $45.1M
23 Tejara Capital Ltd 0.64% 90,400 $2.0M
24 Selective Wealth Management, Inc. 0.62% 95,602 $2.1M
25 Kerrisdale Advisers, LLC 0.57% 68,980 $1.5M
Investor Ownership
History 		% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Gitlab Inc (GTLB)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for GTLB?

Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row: For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their GTLB positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.

What is the institutional breadth score for GTLB?

Slight buying edge — 52% buying: Last quarter: 242 funds bought or added vs 226 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.

What is the fund quality score for GTLB holders?

Strong quality — 38% AUM from major funds: 54 of 362 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, accounting for 38% of total institutional value held. A meaningful share of the ownership value comes from the most well-resourced institutions.

How long have hedge funds held GTLB?

46% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 167 out of 366 hedge funds have held GTLB for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Is it too late to buy Gitlab Inc (GTLB) following the 2026 Q1 hedge fund 13F filings?

As of today, GTLB has moved +17.5% since the 2026 Q1 13F filing date (May 15, 2026), compared to +3.9% for the XLK sector ETF — an outperformance of +13.6%. Since the quarter end (March 31, 2026), GTLB has gained +28.4% vs +37.9% for XLK. The stock has meaningfully outrun its sector. The trade has partially played out; entry is at a premium to the fund's implied reference.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →