Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Goodyear Tire & Rubr Co (GT)

383 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in GT. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Fetching live quote...
Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↓ -8
Streak
1Q ▼
Buyers last Q
52%

Smart Money Signals — GT

Based on 386 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly

📉

Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row

last 6Q
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their GT positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
🏔️

At the ownership peak (96% of max)

96% of all-time peak
386 hedge funds hold GT right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
〰️

Stable — ownership unchanged year-over-year

fund count last 6Q
The number of hedge funds holding GT is almost the same as a year ago (+2 funds, +1% change). No significant rush to buy or sell — institutional backing is holding steady.
🟡

Slight buying edge — 52% buying

211 buying196 selling
Last quarter: 211 funds bought or added vs 196 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.
⚠️

Fewer new buyers each quarter (-11 vs last Q)

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 71 → 57 → 73 → 62. Each quarter fewer new institutions are entering. This usually means most funds that wanted in are already in — the stock is well-known but the pool of potential new buyers is shrinking.
🔒

68% of holders stayed for 2+ years

68% conviction (2yr+) 19% medium 13% new
262 out of 386 hedge funds have held GT for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💎

Buying through price weakness — shares -3%, value -29%

Value
-29%
Shares
-3%
Last quarter: funds added -3% more shares while total portfolio value only changed -29%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
➡️

Steady discovery — ~62 new funds/quarter

58 → 71 → 57 → 73 → 62 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 71 → 57 → 73 → 62. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 75% veterans vs 16% newcomers

75% veterans 9% 1-2yr 16% new
Entry-cohort mix of 407 holders: 306 (75%) are 2+ year veterans, 35 entered 1–2 years ago, and 66 (16%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆

Elite ownership — 53% AUM from top-100 funds

53% from top-100 AUM funds
47 of 381 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 53% of total institutional value in GT. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
3.1
out of 10
Low Exit Risk
Exit risk score 3.1/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — GT

In 2026 Q1, 211 hedge funds were net buyers of GT (62 opened a new position, 149 added to an existing one), while 196 reduced or exited (126 trimmed, 70 sold completely) — a 52% buyer ratio, indicating a slight buying edge. 53% of total institutional value in GT is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting elite-tier ownership quality. Net fund flow last quarter: -8 funds (more exits than new entries). Total institutional holders: 386.

Hedge Fund Ownership: GT

How many hedge funds hold GT — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of GT vs. share price

Market Analysis: GT

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: GT

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Is It Too Late to Buy Goodyear Tire & Rubr Co (GT) Based on Hedge Fund 13F Filings?

Signal Freshness measures how much GT has moved relative to its sector benchmark (XLY) since the 2026 Q1 13F filing. A stock that has barely outrun its sector is still a relatively fresh entry point — the fund's thesis has not yet been priced in by the broader market.

Since Quarter End March 31, 2026 · 76d ago
GT
-3.5%
XLY
+7.0%

GT outperformed XLY by -10.5% since March 31, 2026.

Since 13F Filing Date May 15, 2026 · 31d ago
GT
+6.7%
XLY
+0.1%

Since the filing became public, GT outperformed XLY by +6.6% .

Interpretation: The stock is tracking its sector benchmark closely. The signal remains fresh and the entry point is still near the fund's implied reference. Learn more →

Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

30 top-rated funds 2 high-conviction
Consensus
6.5
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
1.9
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: GT
383 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in GT. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q1) Prior (2025 Q4) Change
Funds Holding 383 394 -2.79%
13F Shares 275M 285M -3.48%
Total Value $1.77B $2.49B -29.0%
New Positions 61 73 -12
Increased Positions 141 127 +14
Closed Positions 72 73 -1
Reduced Positions 122 140 -18
Total Calls 14 18 -22.22%
Total Puts 12 16 -25.0%
PUT/CALL Ratio 0.86 0.89 Neutral

Statistics: GT

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q1)

383 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in GT. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 GT holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q1 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 LM Asset Management Inc. 7.03% 2,040,000 $13.5M
2 Paloma Partners Management Co 2.60% 2,000,000 $13.3M
3 Sippican Capital Advisors 1.52% 335,785 $2.2M
4 Maple Rock Capital Partners Inc. 1.25% 5,817,063 $38.6M
5 IPG Investment Advisors LLC 0.94% 828,725 $5.5M
6 Anderson Financial Strategies, LLC 0.92% 236,867 $1.7M
7 KLCM Advisors, Inc. 0.91% 1,626,722 $10.8M
8 Bastion Asset Management Inc. 0.83% 406,847 $2.7M
9 Readystate Asset Management LP 0.78% 2,606,350 $17.3M
10 Ironwood Investment Management LLC 0.66% 240,000 $1.6M
11 Barnett & Company, Inc. 0.62% 120,240 $797K
12 4wealth Advisors, INC. 0.53% 98,877 $622K
13 nVerses Capital, LLC 0.38% 63,778 $423K
14 Chelsea Counsel Co 0.37% 97,250 $852K
15 Bayforest Capital Ltd 0.32% 43,480 $288K
16 Quinn Opportunity Partners LLC 0.31% 893,917 $5.9M
17 Bridgeway Capital Management, LLC 0.28% 2,095,329 $13.9M
18 Gendell Jeffrey L 0.27% 2,960,011 $19.6M
19 SummerHaven Investment Management, LLC 0.23% 57,217 $379K
20 Guardian Investment Management 0.23% 43,200 $286K
21 KLCM Advisors, Inc. 0.22% 386,000 $2.6M
22 Dark Forest Capital Management LP 0.19% 318,077 $2.1M
23 Lombard Odier Asset Management (USA) Corp 0.16% 226,000 $1.5M
24 GatePass Capital, LLC 0.15% 47,500 $315K
25 Counterpoint Mutual Funds LLC 0.12% 124,171 $823K
Investor Ownership
History
% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Goodyear Tire & Rubr Co (GT)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for GT?

Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row: For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their GT positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.

What is the institutional breadth score for GT?

Slight buying edge — 52% buying: Last quarter: 211 funds bought or added vs 196 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.

What is the fund quality score for GT holders?

Elite ownership — 53% AUM from top-100 funds: 47 of 381 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 53% of total institutional value in GT. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held GT?

68% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 262 out of 386 hedge funds have held GT for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Is it too late to buy Goodyear Tire & Rubr Co (GT) following the 2026 Q1 hedge fund 13F filings?

As of today, GT has moved +6.7% since the 2026 Q1 13F filing date (May 15, 2026), compared to +0.1% for the XLY sector ETF — an outperformance of +6.6%. Since the quarter end (March 31, 2026), GT has gained -3.5% vs +7.0% for XLY. The stock is tracking its sector benchmark closely. The signal remains fresh and the entry point is still near the fund's implied reference.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →