Based on 18 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly
📉
Selling streak — 2 quarters in a row
For 2 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds reduced or closed their GIPR positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
📊
High ownership — 82% of 3.0Y peak
82% of all-time peak
18 funds currently hold this stock — 82% of the 3.0-year high of 22 funds (reached 2025 Q1). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
📉
Outflows — 18% fewer funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
4 fewer hedge funds hold GIPR compared to a year ago (-18% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🟠
More sellers than buyers — 46% buying
6 buying7 selling
Last quarter: 7 funds reduced or exited vs 6 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~3 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 3 → 4 → 3 → 3. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒
44% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 44% conviction (2yr+)
■ 33% medium
■ 22% new
8 out of 18 hedge funds have held GIPR for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💎
Buying through price weakness — shares +20%, value -52%
Last quarter: funds added +20% more shares while total portfolio value only changed -52%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~3 new funds/quarter
4 → 3 → 4 → 3 → 3 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 3 → 4 → 3 → 3. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
📊
Mixed cohorts — 39% veterans, 39% new entrants
■ 39% veterans
■ 22% 1-2yr
■ 39% new
Of 18 current holders: 7 (39%) held 2+ years, 4 held 1–2 years, 7 (39%) entered in the past year. Balanced distribution — some institutional memory, some recent momentum buyers.
✅
Strong quality — 27% AUM from major funds
27% from top-100 AUM funds
4 of 18 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, accounting for 27% of total institutional value held. A meaningful share of the ownership value comes from the most well-resourced institutions.
Exit risk score 2.9/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.