Based on 16 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly
📈
Buying streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds added GENK than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🔻
Below peak — only 52% of 3.0Y high
52% of all-time peak
Only 16 funds hold GENK today versus a peak of 31 funds at 2023 Q4 — just 52% of the maximum. Low institutional ownership can mean the stock is out of favor, but it also means there's a large pool of potential buyers if sentiment turns.
📉
Outflows — 38% fewer funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
10 fewer hedge funds hold GENK compared to a year ago (-38% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🟡
Slight buying edge — 50% buying
7 buying7 selling
Last quarter: 7 funds bought or added vs 7 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~6 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 3 → 3 → 1 → 6. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
📌
Mixed — 25% long-term, 38% new
■ 25% conviction (2yr+)
■ 38% medium
■ 38% new
Of the 16 current holders: 4 (25%) held >2 years, 6 held 1–2 years, and 6 entered in the last year. A mixed base — the stock has long-term believers but also recent buyers who haven't been tested by a downturn yet.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~6 new funds/quarter
1 → 3 → 3 → 1 → 6 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 3 → 3 → 1 → 6. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
📊
Mixed cohorts — 31% veterans, 31% new entrants
■ 31% veterans
■ 38% 1-2yr
■ 31% new
Of 16 current holders: 5 (31%) held 2+ years, 6 held 1–2 years, 5 (31%) entered in the past year. Balanced distribution — some institutional memory, some recent momentum buyers.
📋
Smaller funds dominant — 19% AUM from top-100
19% from top-100 AUM funds
7 of 16 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 19% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.
Exit risk score 1.5/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.