Based on 14 hedge funds · latest filing: 2025 Q4 · updated quarterly
📉
Selling streak — 4 quarters in a row
For 4 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds reduced or closed their GENK positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
🔻
Below peak — only 45% of 2.8Y high
45% of all-time peak
Only 14 funds hold GENK today versus a peak of 31 funds at 2023 Q4 — just 45% of the maximum. Low institutional ownership can mean the stock is out of favor, but it also means there's a large pool of potential buyers if sentiment turns.
📉
Outflows — 50% fewer funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
14 fewer hedge funds hold GENK compared to a year ago (-50% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🔴
Heavy selling pressure — only 33% buying
4 buying8 selling
Last quarter: 8 funds sold vs only 4 buyers. This is widespread institutional distribution — not a few funds rebalancing, but a broad exit. High conviction bearish signal.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~1 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 1 → 3 → 3 → 1. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
📌
Mixed — 36% long-term, 7% new
■ 36% conviction (2yr+)
■ 57% medium
■ 7% new
Of the 14 current holders: 5 (36%) held >2 years, 8 held 1–2 years, and 1 entered in the last year. A mixed base — the stock has long-term believers but also recent buyers who haven't been tested by a downturn yet.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~1 new funds/quarter
8 → 1 → 3 → 3 → 1 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 1 → 3 → 3 → 1. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
📊
Mixed cohorts — 36% veterans, 29% new entrants
■ 36% veterans
■ 36% 1-2yr
■ 29% new
Of 14 current holders: 5 (36%) held 2+ years, 5 held 1–2 years, 4 (29%) entered in the past year. Balanced distribution — some institutional memory, some recent momentum buyers.
🏆
Elite ownership — 64% AUM from top-100 funds
64% from top-100 AUM funds
9 of 14 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 64% of total institutional value in GENK. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
Exit risk score 1.3/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.