Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

FTC SOLAR INC COM NEW (FTCI)

41 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in FTCI. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↑ +15
Streak
3Q ▲
Buyers last Q
79%

Smart Money Signals — FTCI

Based on 39 hedge funds · latest filing: 2025 Q4 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 3 quarters in a row

last 6Q
For 3 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added FTCI than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🔻

Below peak — only 42% of 3.0Y high

42% of all-time peak
Only 39 funds hold FTCI today versus a peak of 93 funds at 2023 Q3 — just 42% of the maximum. Low institutional ownership can mean the stock is out of favor, but it also means there's a large pool of potential buyers if sentiment turns.
🚀

Fast accumulation — +86% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
+18 new funds entered over the past year (+86% YoY). That's a rapid rush of institutional money. Fast accumulation often signals a major thesis — but it also means the stock could fall quickly if that thesis breaks.
🟢

More buyers than sellers — 79% buying

31 buying8 selling
Last quarter: 31 funds were net buyers (18 opened a brand new position + 13 added to an existing one). Only 8 were sellers (5 trimmed + 3 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.
📈

More new buyers each quarter (+13 vs last Q)

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening a new FTCI position: 4 → 4 → 5 → 18. A growing influx of new institutional buyers means the asset is still gathering momentum — the consensus hasn't fully saturated yet.
🔒

54% of holders stayed for 2+ years

■ 54% conviction (2yr+) ■ 21% medium ■ 26% new
21 out of 39 hedge funds have held FTCI for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💰

Value +228% but shares only +107% — price-driven

Value
+228%
Shares
+106%
Last quarter: the total dollar value of institutional holdings rose +228%, but actual share count only changed +107%. The gap is explained by the stock's price rising — not new buying. Strong value growth with weak share growth means the rally is price momentum, not fresh institutional demand.
🚀

Acceleration phase — new buyers rushing in

2 → 4 → 4 → 5 → 18 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 4 → 4 → 5 → 18. The pace of institutional discovery is accelerating sharply. This is the 'hot idea' phase — the thesis is being passed from fund to fund. You are not late — the accumulation wave is still building.
🏛️

Deep conviction — 71% of holders stayed 2+ years

■ 71% veterans ■ 10% 1-2yr ■ 20% new
Of 41 current holders: 29 (71%) have held for over 2 years without selling. These are not momentum buyers — they have lived through drawdowns and stayed. A large veteran base acts as a stabilizing force during selloffs.
🏆

Elite ownership — 42% AUM from top-100 funds

42% from top-100 AUM funds
12 of 39 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 42% of total institutional value in FTCI. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
1.6
out of 10
Low Exit Risk
Exit risk score 1.6/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — FTCI

In 2025 Q4, 31 hedge funds were net buyers of FTCI (18 opened a new position, 13 added to an existing one), while 8 reduced or exited (5 trimmed, 3 sold completely) — a 79% buyer ratio, indicating clear institutional accumulation. This marks 3 consecutive quarters of net institutional buying — a persistent conviction signal. 42% of total institutional value in FTCI is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting elite-tier ownership quality. Net fund flow last quarter: +15 funds (more new holders than closures). Total institutional holders: 39.

Hedge Fund Ownership: FTCI

How many hedge funds hold FTCI — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of FTCI vs. share price

Market Analysis: FTCI

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: FTCI

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

7 top-rated funds 0 high-conviction
Consensus
3.9
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
0.0
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: FTCI
2026 Q1 Stats Unlock in 5 days 41 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in FTCI. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2025 Q4) Prior (2025 Q3) Change
Funds Holding 41 26 57.69%
13F Shares 2M 845K 106.51%
Total Value $19M $6M 227.99%
New Positions 18 5 +13
Increased Positions 16 7 +9
Closed Positions 3 4 -1
Reduced Positions 7 5 +2
Total Calls 1 2 -50.0%
Total Puts 1 0 100%
PUT/CALL Ratio 1.0 0.0 Neutral

Statistics: FTCI

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q1)

41 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in FTCI. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 institutional holders of FTCI — 2025 Q4 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Electron Capital Partners, LLC 0.01% 90,201 $341K
2 GSA CAPITAL PARTNERS LLP 0.01% 49,461 —
3 LAUREL OAK WEALTH MANAGEMENT, LLC 0.01% 16,000 $60K
4 AXQ CAPITAL, LP 0.01% 13,189 $50K
5 BRIDGEWAY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC 0.00% 39,034 $148K
6 Richardson Capital Management LLC 0.00% 1,016 $4K
7 Graham Capital Management, L.P. 0.00% 13,882 $52K
8 Centiva Capital, LP 0.00% 37,175 $141K
9 Engineers Gate Manager LP 0.00% 13,565 $51K
10 RENAISSANCE TECHNOLOGIES LLC 0.00% 93,400 $353K
11 Squarepoint Ops LLC 0.00% 94,031 $355K
12 MARSHALL WACE, LLP 0.00% 103,608 $392K
13 Tower Research Capital LLC (TRC) 0.00% 3,727 $14K
14 Cerity Partners LLC 0.00% 49,031 $185K
15 Millstone Evans Group, LLC 0.00% 96 —
16 ACADIAN ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC 0.00% 40,731 —
17 HRT FINANCIAL LP 0.00% 21,307 $80K
18 Fortitude Family Office, LLC 0.00% 112 —
19 Mitsubishi UFJ Asset Management Co., Ltd. 0.00% 26,379 $100K
20 VANGUARD FIDUCIARY TRUST CO 0.00% 59,403 $225K
21 VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC 0.00% 445,079 $1.7M
22 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC 0.00% 33,363 $126K
23 UBS Group AG 0.00% 23,623 $89K
24 BlackRock, Inc. 0.00% 102,048 $386K
25 CITADEL ADVISORS LLC 0.00% 10,700 $40K
Investor Ownership
History 		% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — FTC SOLAR INC COM NEW (FTCI)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for FTCI?

Buying streak — 3 quarters in a row: For 3 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added FTCI than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for FTCI?

More buyers than sellers — 79% buying: Last quarter: 31 funds were net buyers (18 opened a brand new position + 13 added to an existing one). Only 8 were sellers (5 trimmed + 3 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.

What is the fund quality score for FTCI holders?

Elite ownership — 42% AUM from top-100 funds: 12 of 39 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 42% of total institutional value in FTCI. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held FTCI?

54% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 21 out of 39 hedge funds have held FTCI for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.