Based on 25 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly
📉
Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their FSZ positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
📊
High ownership — 89% of 3.0Y peak
89% of all-time peak
25 funds currently hold this stock — 89% of the 3.0-year high of 28 funds (reached 2025 Q2). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
📉
Outflows — 11% fewer funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
3 fewer hedge funds hold FSZ compared to a year ago (-11% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🟠
More sellers than buyers — 43% buying
10 buying13 selling
Last quarter: 13 funds reduced or exited vs 10 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~3 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 2 → 6 → 5 → 3. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒
64% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 64% conviction (2yr+)
■ 20% medium
■ 16% new
16 out of 25 hedge funds have held FSZ for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~3 new funds/quarter
4 → 2 → 6 → 5 → 3 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 2 → 6 → 5 → 3. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 68% veterans vs 16% newcomers
■ 68% veterans
■ 16% 1-2yr
■ 16% new
Entry-cohort mix of 25 holders: 17 (68%) are 2+ year veterans, 4 entered 1–2 years ago, and 4 (16%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
📋
Smaller funds dominant — 17% AUM from top-100
17% from top-100 AUM funds
8 of 25 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 17% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.
Exit risk score 3.2/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.