Based on 323 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly
📈
Buying streak — 2 quarters in a row
For 2 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added FFBC than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️
At the ownership peak (100% of max)
100% of all-time peak
323 hedge funds hold FFBC right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
📶
Steady growth — +14% more funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
+39 new funds entered over the past year (+14% YoY). Gradual, steady growth in institutional ownership is generally a healthy signal — not a speculative rush, but consistent conviction.
🟡
Slight buying edge — 59% buying
173 buying119 selling
Last quarter: 173 funds bought or added vs 119 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.
⚠️
Fewer new buyers each quarter (-6 vs last Q)
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 35 → 46 → 57 → 51. Each quarter fewer new institutions are entering. This usually means most funds that wanted in are already in — the stock is well-known but the pool of potential new buyers is shrinking.
🔒
62% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 62% conviction (2yr+)
■ 15% medium
■ 24% new
199 out of 323 hedge funds have held FFBC for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💰
Value +30% but shares only +8% — price-driven
Last quarter: the total dollar value of institutional holdings rose +30%, but actual share count only changed +8%. The gap is explained by the stock's price rising — not new buying. Strong value growth with weak share growth means the rally is price momentum, not fresh institutional demand.
📈
Growing discovery — still being found
32 → 35 → 46 → 57 → 51 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 35 → 46 → 57 → 51. A growing number of institutions are discovering FFBC each quarter. The narrative is still spreading — leaving room for ongoing capital accumulation.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 65% veterans vs 25% newcomers
■ 65% veterans
■ 10% 1-2yr
■ 25% new
Entry-cohort mix of 325 holders: 210 (65%) are 2+ year veterans, 33 entered 1–2 years ago, and 82 (25%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆
Elite ownership — 58% AUM from top-100 funds
58% from top-100 AUM funds
52 of 321 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 58% of total institutional value in FFBC. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
Exit risk score 3.8/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.