Based on 4 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly
📉
Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their FCFY positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
📊
High ownership — 80% of 2.8Y peak
80% of all-time peak
4 funds currently hold this stock — 80% of the 2.8-year high of 5 funds (reached 2025 Q1). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
📉
Outflows — 20% fewer funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
1 fewer hedge funds hold FCFY compared to a year ago (-20% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🔴
Heavy selling pressure — only 33% buying
1 buying2 selling
Last quarter: 2 funds sold vs only 1 buyers. This is widespread institutional distribution — not a few funds rebalancing, but a broad exit. High conviction bearish signal.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~0 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 0 → 1 → 1 → 0. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
📌
Mixed — 25% long-term, 25% new
■ 25% conviction (2yr+)
■ 50% medium
■ 25% new
Of the 4 current holders: 1 (25%) held >2 years, 2 held 1–2 years, and 1 entered in the last year. A mixed base — the stock has long-term believers but also recent buyers who haven't been tested by a downturn yet.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~0 new funds/quarter
1 → 0 → 1 → 1 → 0 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 0 → 1 → 1 → 0. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
📊
Mixed cohorts — 25% veterans, 50% new entrants
■ 25% veterans
■ 25% 1-2yr
■ 50% new
Of 4 current holders: 1 (25%) held 2+ years, 1 held 1–2 years, 2 (50%) entered in the past year. Balanced distribution — some institutional memory, some recent momentum buyers.
🏆
Elite ownership — 58% AUM from top-100 funds
58% from top-100 AUM funds
1 of 4 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 58% of total institutional value in FCFY. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
Exit risk score 3.5/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.