Based on 23 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly
➡️
No change last quarter
The number of hedge funds holding this stock didn't change last quarter. Neither a buying nor selling signal on its own — watch the next quarter for direction.
📊
High ownership — 79% of 3.0Y peak
79% of all-time peak
23 funds currently hold this stock — 79% of the 3.0-year high of 29 funds (reached 2023 Q4). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
📶
Steady growth — +5% more funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
+1 new funds entered over the past year (+5% YoY). Gradual, steady growth in institutional ownership is generally a healthy signal — not a speculative rush, but consistent conviction. The peak was reached in just 2 quarters from the low — a sharp move.
🟢
More buyers than sellers — 62% buying
5 buying3 selling
Last quarter: 5 funds were net buyers (2 opened a brand new position + 3 added to an existing one). Only 3 were sellers (1 trimmed + 2 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~2 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 0 → 1 → 3 → 2. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒
78% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 78% conviction (2yr+)
■ 0% medium
■ 22% new
18 out of 23 hedge funds have held FBYDW for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💎
Buying through price weakness — shares +1%, value -96%
Last quarter: funds added +1% more shares while total portfolio value only changed -96%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~2 new funds/quarter
1 → 0 → 1 → 3 → 2 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 0 → 1 → 3 → 2. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 70% veterans vs 22% newcomers
■ 70% veterans
■ 9% 1-2yr
■ 22% new
Entry-cohort mix of 23 holders: 16 (70%) are 2+ year veterans, 2 entered 1–2 years ago, and 5 (22%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
📋
Smaller funds dominant — 8% AUM from top-100
8% from top-100 AUM funds
2 of 21 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 8% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.
Exit risk score 2.6/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.