Based on 7 hedge funds · latest filing: 2025 Q4 · updated quarterly
➡️
No change last quarter
The number of hedge funds holding this stock didn't change last quarter. Neither a buying nor selling signal on its own — watch the next quarter for direction.
📊
High ownership — 70% of 3.0Y peak
70% of all-time peak
7 funds currently hold this stock — 70% of the 3.0-year high of 10 funds (reached 2023 Q2). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
📉
Outflows — 12% fewer funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
1 fewer hedge funds hold EVMT compared to a year ago (-12% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🔴
Heavy selling pressure — only 38% buying
3 buying5 selling
Last quarter: 5 funds sold vs only 3 buyers. This is widespread institutional distribution — not a few funds rebalancing, but a broad exit. High conviction bearish signal.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~2 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 3 → 0 → 1 → 2. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒
43% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 43% conviction (2yr+)
■ 29% medium
■ 29% new
3 out of 7 hedge funds have held EVMT for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💰
Value +347% but shares only +330% — price-driven
Last quarter: the total dollar value of institutional holdings rose +347%, but actual share count only changed +330%. The gap is explained by the stock's price rising — not new buying. Strong value growth with weak share growth means the rally is price momentum, not fresh institutional demand.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~2 new funds/quarter
0 → 3 → 0 → 1 → 2 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 3 → 0 → 1 → 2. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Deep conviction — 57% of holders stayed 2+ years
■ 57% veterans
■ 0% 1-2yr
■ 43% new
Of 7 current holders: 4 (57%) have held for over 2 years without selling. These are not momentum buyers — they have lived through drawdowns and stayed. A large veteran base acts as a stabilizing force during selloffs.
📋
Smaller funds dominant — 3% AUM from top-100
3% from top-100 AUM funds
2 of 7 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 3% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.
Exit risk score 2.8/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.