Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

ETHZILLA CORPORATION (ETHZ)

63 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in ETHZ. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↑ +55
Streak
2Q ▲
Buyers last Q
95%

Smart Money Signals — ETHZ

Based on 58 hedge funds · latest filing: 2025 Q4 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 2 quarters in a row

last 6Q
For 2 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added ETHZ than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️

At the ownership peak (100% of max)

100% of all-time peak
58 hedge funds hold ETHZ right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
🚀

Fast accumulation — +5700% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
+57 new funds entered over the past year (+5700% YoY). That's a rapid rush of institutional money. Fast accumulation often signals a major thesis — but it also means the stock could fall quickly if that thesis breaks.
🟢

More buyers than sellers — 95% buying

56 buying3 selling
Last quarter: 56 funds were net buyers (56 opened a brand new position + 0 added to an existing one). Only 3 were sellers (2 trimmed + 1 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.
📈

More new buyers each quarter (+53 vs last Q)

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening a new ETHZ position: 0 → 0 → 3 → 56. A growing influx of new institutional buyers means the asset is still gathering momentum — the consensus hasn't fully saturated yet.
🔄

Mostly new holders — 98% entered in last year

■ 2% conviction (2yr+) ■ 0% medium ■ 98% new
Only 1 funds (2%) have held >2 years. The majority of current holders are relatively new to the position. New holders tend to sell faster when prices drop — a shallow conviction base that could amplify any sell-off.
💰

Value +184891% but shares only +91211% — price-driven

Value
+184890%
Shares
+91211%
Last quarter: the total dollar value of institutional holdings rose +184891%, but actual share count only changed +91211%. The gap is explained by the stock's price rising — not new buying. Strong value growth with weak share growth means the rally is price momentum, not fresh institutional demand.
➡️

Steady discovery — ~56 new funds/quarter

0 → 0 → 0 → 3 → 56 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 0 → 0 → 3 → 56. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🌱

Early stage — 98% of holders entered in last year

■ 2% veterans ■ 0% 1-2yr ■ 98% new
Of 64 current holders: 63 (98%) entered in the past year, only 1 (2%) are 2+ year veterans. This is an early-phase institutional idea — still being discovered. High upside potential if the thesis plays out, but thin conviction base.
🏆

Elite ownership — 66% AUM from top-100 funds

66% from top-100 AUM funds
22 of 58 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 66% of total institutional value in ETHZ. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
7.5
out of 10
High Exit Risk
Exit risk score 7.5/10 — multiple crowding signals converge. Institutional ownership is at 100% of its all-time high — near peak crowding. Crowded trades can unwind fast — a single catalyst can trigger a cascade.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — ETHZ

In 2025 Q4, 56 hedge funds were net buyers of ETHZ (56 opened a brand-new position), while 3 reduced or exited (2 trimmed, 1 sold completely) — a 95% buyer ratio, indicating clear institutional accumulation. Net buying has persisted for two consecutive quarters, a positive momentum signal. 66% of total institutional value in ETHZ is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting elite-tier ownership quality. Net fund flow last quarter: +55 funds (more new holders than closures). Total institutional holders: 58.

Hedge Fund Ownership: ETHZ

How many hedge funds hold ETHZ — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of ETHZ vs. share price

Market Analysis: ETHZ

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: ETHZ

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

12 top-rated funds 0 high-conviction
Consensus
4.8
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
0.0
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: ETHZ
2026 Q1 Stats Unlock in 4 days 63 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in ETHZ. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2025 Q4) Prior (2025 Q3) Change
Funds Holding 63 2 3050.0%
13F Shares 11M 12K 91773.7%
Total Value $56M $30K 186032.71%
New Positions 62 2 +60
Increased Positions 0 0 -
Closed Positions 1 0 +1
Reduced Positions 1 0 +1
Total Calls 6 0 100%
Total Puts 4 0 100%
PUT/CALL Ratio 0.67 0.0 Bullish

Statistics: ETHZ

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q1)

63 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in ETHZ. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 institutional holders of ETHZ — 2025 Q4 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Electric Capital Partners, LLC 3.38% 1,375,956 $4.0M
2 Hunting Hill Global Capital, LLC 1.91% 852,111 $2.5M
3 Stokes Family Office, LLC 0.23% 767,800 $2.2M
4 Almitas Capital LLC 0.05% 80,408 $232K
5 J. Derek Lewis & Associates Inc. 0.04% 37,000 $181K
6 Saba Capital Management, L.P. 0.04% 480,709 $1.4M
7 WOLVERINE ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC 0.01% 519,294 $1.5M
8 DRW Securities, LLC 0.01% 270,733 $782K
9 GM Advisory Group, LLC 0.01% 56,603 $164K
10 Woodline Partners LP 0.01% 538,053 $1.6M
11 SkyView Investment Advisors, LLC 0.00% 12,500 —
12 K2 PRINCIPAL FUND, L.P. 0.00% 11,644 $34K
13 ExodusPoint Capital Management, LP 0.00% 95,491 $276K
14 SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP 0.00% 3,795,600 $11.0M
15 Schonfeld Strategic Advisors LLC 0.00% 56,285 $163K
16 Liontrust Investment Partners LLP 0.00% 14,629 $72K
17 Man Group plc 0.00% 56,555 $163K
18 GROUP ONE TRADING LLC 0.00% 33,621 $97K
19 CITADEL ADVISORS LLC 0.00% 345,225 $998K
20 UBS Group AG 0.00% 327,794 $947K
21 JANE STREET GROUP, LLC 0.00% 352,900 $1.0M
22 MILLENNIUM MANAGEMENT LLC 0.00% 72,345 $209K
23 BARCLAYS PLC 0.00% 96,082 $278K
24 VANGUARD FIDUCIARY TRUST CO 0.00% 80,049 $231K
25 CITADEL ADVISORS LLC 0.00% 116,180 $336K
Investor Ownership
History 		% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — ETHZILLA CORPORATION (ETHZ)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for ETHZ?

Buying streak — 2 quarters in a row: For 2 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added ETHZ than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for ETHZ?

More buyers than sellers — 95% buying: Last quarter: 56 funds were net buyers (56 opened a brand new position + 0 added to an existing one). Only 3 were sellers (2 trimmed + 1 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.

What is the fund quality score for ETHZ holders?

Elite ownership — 66% AUM from top-100 funds: 22 of 58 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 66% of total institutional value in ETHZ. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held ETHZ?

Mostly new holders — 98% entered in last year: Only 1 funds (2%) have held >2 years. The majority of current holders are relatively new to the position. New holders tend to sell faster when prices drop — a shallow conviction base that could amplify any sell-off.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.