Based on 17 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly
📈
Buying streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds added DTST than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🔻
Below peak — only 52% of 3.0Y high
52% of all-time peak
Only 17 funds hold DTST today versus a peak of 33 funds at 2025 Q4 — just 52% of the maximum. Low institutional ownership can mean the stock is out of favor, but it also means there's a large pool of potential buyers if sentiment turns.
📉
Outflows — 19% fewer funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
4 fewer hedge funds hold DTST compared to a year ago (-19% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🟠
More sellers than buyers — 43% buying
6 buying8 selling
Last quarter: 8 funds reduced or exited vs 6 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~5 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 5 → 12 → 4 → 5. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
📌
Mixed — 35% long-term, 41% new
■ 35% conviction (2yr+)
■ 24% medium
■ 41% new
Of the 17 current holders: 6 (35%) held >2 years, 4 held 1–2 years, and 7 entered in the last year. A mixed base — the stock has long-term believers but also recent buyers who haven't been tested by a downturn yet.
⚠️
Saturation — most institutions already know this story
3 → 5 → 12 → 4 → 5 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 5 → 12 → 4 → 5. Far fewer institutions are entering now vs. a year ago. When the pool of potential new buyers shrinks this fast, future price support from institutional inflows weakens significantly.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 41% veterans vs 41% newcomers
■ 41% veterans
■ 18% 1-2yr
■ 41% new
Entry-cohort mix of 17 holders: 7 (41%) are 2+ year veterans, 3 entered 1–2 years ago, and 7 (41%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆
Elite ownership — 42% AUM from top-100 funds
42% from top-100 AUM funds
7 of 16 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 42% of total institutional value in DTST. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
Exit risk score 2.0/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.