Based on 4 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly
📉
Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their DHIL positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
🔻
Below peak — only 2% of 3.0Y high
2% of all-time peak
Only 4 funds hold DHIL today versus a peak of 160 funds at 2026 Q1 — just 2% of the maximum. Low institutional ownership can mean the stock is out of favor, but it also means there's a large pool of potential buyers if sentiment turns.
📉
Outflows — 97% fewer funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
124 fewer hedge funds hold DHIL compared to a year ago (-97% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🔴
Heavy selling pressure — only 1% buying
2 buying159 selling
Last quarter: 159 funds sold vs only 2 buyers. This is widespread institutional distribution — not a few funds rebalancing, but a broad exit. High conviction bearish signal.
⚠️
Fewer new buyers each quarter (-29 vs last Q)
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 21 → 40 → 31 → 2. Each quarter fewer new institutions are entering. This usually means most funds that wanted in are already in — the stock is well-known but the pool of potential new buyers is shrinking.
📌
Mixed — 25% long-term, 0% new
■ 25% conviction (2yr+)
■ 75% medium
■ 0% new
Of the 4 current holders: 1 (25%) held >2 years, 3 held 1–2 years, and 0 entered in the last year. A mixed base — the stock has long-term believers but also recent buyers who haven't been tested by a downturn yet.
⚠️
Saturation — most institutions already know this story
19 → 21 → 40 → 31 → 2 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 21 → 40 → 31 → 2. Far fewer institutions are entering now vs. a year ago. When the pool of potential new buyers shrinks this fast, future price support from institutional inflows weakens significantly.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 75% veterans vs 25% newcomers
■ 75% veterans
■ 0% 1-2yr
■ 25% new
Entry-cohort mix of 4 holders: 3 (75%) are 2+ year veterans, 0 entered 1–2 years ago, and 1 (25%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
📋
Smaller funds dominant — 0% AUM from top-100
0% from top-100 AUM funds
0 of 4 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 0% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.
Exit risk score 2.5/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.