Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Critical Metals Corp (CRML)

164 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in CRML. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Fetching live quote...
Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↑ +9
Streak
6Q ▲
Buyers last Q
59%

Smart Money Signals — CRML

Based on 173 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 6 quarters in a row

last 6Q
For 6 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added CRML than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️

At the ownership peak (100% of max)

100% of all-time peak
173 hedge funds hold CRML right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
🚀

Fast accumulation — +144% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
+102 new funds entered over the past year (+144% YoY). That's a rapid rush of institutional money. Fast accumulation often signals a major thesis — but it also means the stock could fall quickly if that thesis breaks.
🟡

Slight buying edge — 59% buying

109 buying76 selling
Last quarter: 109 funds bought or added vs 76 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.
⚠️

Fewer new buyers each quarter (-18 vs last Q)

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 47 → 51 → 57 → 39. Each quarter fewer new institutions are entering. This usually means most funds that wanted in are already in — the stock is well-known but the pool of potential new buyers is shrinking.
🔄

Mostly new holders — 56% entered in last year

■ 13% conviction (2yr+) ■ 31% medium ■ 56% new
Only 22 funds (13%) have held >2 years. The majority of current holders are relatively new to the position. New holders tend to sell faster when prices drop — a shallow conviction base that could amplify any sell-off.
💰

Value +99% but shares only +51% — price-driven

Value
+98%
Shares
+50%
Last quarter: the total dollar value of institutional holdings rose +99%, but actual share count only changed +51%. The gap is explained by the stock's price rising — not new buying. Strong value growth with weak share growth means the rally is price momentum, not fresh institutional demand.
➡️

Steady discovery — ~39 new funds/quarter

31 → 47 → 51 → 57 → 39 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 47 → 51 → 57 → 39. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🌱

Early stage — 76% of holders entered in last year

■ 5% veterans ■ 18% 1-2yr ■ 76% new
Of 190 current holders: 145 (76%) entered in the past year, only 10 (5%) are 2+ year veterans. This is an early-phase institutional idea — still being discovered. High upside potential if the thesis plays out, but thin conviction base.
🏆

Elite ownership — 66% AUM from top-100 funds

66% from top-100 AUM funds
34 of 167 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 66% of total institutional value in CRML. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
5.6
out of 10
Moderate Exit Risk
Exit risk score 5.6/10 — some crowding factors present, but no critical concentration. Watch ownership trend over the next 1–2 quarters for direction.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — CRML

In 2026 Q2, 109 hedge funds were net buyers of CRML (39 opened a new position, 70 added to an existing one), while 76 reduced or exited (46 trimmed, 30 sold completely) — a 59% buyer ratio, indicating a slight buying edge. This marks 6 consecutive quarters of net institutional buying — a persistent conviction signal. 66% of total institutional value in CRML is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting elite-tier ownership quality. Net fund flow last quarter: +9 funds (more new holders than closures). Total institutional holders: 173.

Hedge Fund Ownership: CRML

How many hedge funds hold CRML — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of CRML vs. share price

Market Analysis: CRML

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: CRML

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

11 top-rated funds 0 high-conviction
Consensus
4.7
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
0.3
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: CRML
164 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in CRML. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q2) Prior (2026 Q1) Change
Funds Holding 164 164 -
13F Shares 44M 29M 50.18%
Total Value $446M $225M 97.93%
New Positions 38 57 -19
Increased Positions 70 64 +6
Closed Positions 32 29 +3
Reduced Positions 39 30 +9
Total Calls 8 11 -27.27%
Total Puts 15 8 87.5%
PUT/CALL Ratio 1.88 0.73 Bearish

Statistics: CRML

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

164 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in CRML. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 CRML holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Kmt Wealth Management, LLC 0.91% 104,770 $1.1M
2 Kingsbury Capital Investment Advisors LLC 0.91% 104,770 $1.1M
3 Marex Group Ltd 0.16% 3,607,198 $37.0M
4 Warberg Asset Management LLC 0.15% 80,200 $822K
5 Greenland Capital Management LP 0.13% 100,000 $1.0M
6 Next Level Private LLC 0.11% 53,955 $553K
7 Optimize Financial INC. 0.09% 23,088 $237K
8 Sound Capital Solutions LLC 0.06% 23,088 $237K
9 Canton Hathaway, LLC 0.04% 20,000 $205K
10 Fosun International Ltd 0.04% 16,666 $171K
11 Banque Cantonale Vaudoise 0.04% 26,000 $267K
12 Consultiva Wealth Management, CORP. 0.03% 1,500 $15K
13 FORA Capital, LLC 0.03% 45,338 $464K
14 Axq Capital, LP 0.03% 27,941 $286K
15 Moors & Cabot, Inc. 0.03% 78,100 $801K
16 Hickory Point Bank & Trust 0.03% 5,000 $51K
17 Entropy Technologies, LP 0.02% 58,688 $602K
18 Alps Advisors Inc 0.02% 397,537 $4.1M
19 LMR Partners LLP 0.02% 478,200 $4.9M
20 Leonteq Securities AG 0.02% 51,349 $526K
21 Bridgewater Associates, LP 0.02% 424,582 $4.4M
22 Headlands Technologies LLC 0.02% 16,081 $165K
23 Insigneo Advisory Services, LLC 0.02% 42,160 $432K
24 Daiwa Securities Group Inc. 0.01% 702,300 $7.2M
25 Transcend Capital Advisors, LLC 0.01% 18,105 $186K
Investor Ownership
History
% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Critical Metals Corp (CRML)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for CRML?

Buying streak — 6 quarters in a row: For 6 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added CRML than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for CRML?

Slight buying edge — 59% buying: Last quarter: 109 funds bought or added vs 76 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.

What is the fund quality score for CRML holders?

Elite ownership — 66% AUM from top-100 funds: 34 of 167 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 66% of total institutional value in CRML. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held CRML?

Mostly new holders — 56% entered in last year: Only 22 funds (13%) have held >2 years. The majority of current holders are relatively new to the position. New holders tend to sell faster when prices drop — a shallow conviction base that could amplify any sell-off.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →