GRANITESHARES ETF TR (COMB): Hedge Fund Ownership & Smart Money Signals (Q4 2025)

GRANITESHARES ETF TR (COMB)

28 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in COMB. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Smart Money Signals — COMB

Based on 28 hedge funds · latest filing: 2025 Q4 · updated quarterly

📉

Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row

last 6Q

For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their COMB positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.

🔻

Below peak — only 55% of 3.0Y high

55% of all-time peak

Only 28 funds hold COMB today versus a peak of 51 funds at 2023 Q1 — just 55% of the maximum. Low institutional ownership can mean the stock is out of favor, but it also means there's a large pool of potential buyers if sentiment turns.

📉

Outflows — 10% fewer funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q

3 fewer hedge funds hold COMB compared to a year ago (-10% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.

🟠

More sellers than buyers — 48% buying

15 buying16 selling

Last quarter: 16 funds reduced or exited vs 15 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.

➡️

Steady new buyers — ~1 new funds per quarter

new funds entering per quarter

Funds opening this position for the first time: 10 → 4 → 6 → 1. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.

🔒

61% of holders stayed for 2+ years

■ 61% conviction (2yr+) ■ 32% medium ■ 7% new

17 out of 28 hedge funds have held COMB for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

⚠️

Saturation — most institutions already know this story

6 → 10 → 4 → 6 → 1 new funds/Q

New funds entering each quarter: 10 → 4 → 6 → 1. Far fewer institutions are entering now vs. a year ago. When the pool of potential new buyers shrinks this fast, future price support from institutional inflows weakens significantly.

🏛️

Deep conviction — 64% of holders stayed 2+ years

■ 64% veterans ■ 21% 1-2yr ■ 14% new

Of 28 current holders: 18 (64%) have held for over 2 years without selling. These are not momentum buyers — they have lived through drawdowns and stayed. A large veteran base acts as a stabilizing force during selloffs.

📋

Smaller funds dominant — 7% AUM from top-100

7% from top-100 AUM funds

4 of 28 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 7% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.

1.0

out of 10

Low Exit Risk

Exit risk score 1.0/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Metric	All 13F Filers (2025 Q4)	Prior (2025 Q3)	Change
Funds Holding	28	35	-20.0%
13F Shares	4M	3M	25.2%
Total Value	$74M	$61M	21.23%
New Positions	1	6	-5
Increased Positions	14	11	+3
Closed Positions	8	5	+3
Reduced Positions	8	9	-1
Total Calls	0	0	-
Total Puts	0	0	-
PUT/CALL Ratio	0.0	0.0	Bullish

Metric

All 13F Filers (2025 Q4)

Prior (2025 Q3)

Change

Funds Holding

-20.0%

13F Shares

25.2%

Total Value

$74M

$61M

21.23%

New Positions

-5

Increased Positions

Closed Positions

Reduced Positions

-1

Total Calls

Total Puts

PUT/CALL Ratio

0.0

Bullish

Institutional Holders (2026 Q1)

28 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in COMB. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

FILTER:All New Added To Reduced No Change | Overweight >5% | SHOW: Active managers + show index funds

Top 15 institutional holders of COMB — 2025 Q4 · Source: SEC Form 13F
#	Investor	% of Portfolio	Shares	Mkt Value
1	Beacon Harbor Wealth Advisors, Inc.	2.82%	512,309	$13.5M
2	One Degree Advisors Inc	1.60%	232,173	$6K
3	Resonant Capital Advisors, LLC	1.28%	926,883	$24.3M
4	Comprehensive Money Management Services LLC	0.57%	33,325	$875K
5	APPLETON PARTNERS INC/MA	0.33%	179,249	$5K
6	Inscription Capital, LLC	0.26%	93,452	$2.5M
7	Braun-Bostich & Associates Inc.	0.16%	9,615	$253K
8	DMC Group, LLC	0.15%	8,710	$229K
9	Brooklyn Investment Group	0.03%	32,546	$855K
10	Vise Technologies, Inc.	0.02%	44,898	$948K
11	IFP Advisors, Inc	0.01%	14,066	$369K
12	Janney Montgomery Scott LLC	0.00%	10,018	—
13	Farther Finance Advisors, LLC	0.00%	1,000	$26K
14	FIFTH THIRD BANCORP	0.00%	1,177	$31K
15	Blue Trust, Inc.	0.00%	11	—

Investor	Ownership History	% of Portfolio	Prev %	Rank	Conviction	Avg Buy Price	13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y	Sell Timing	Shares	Mkt Value	Change	Change %	Source	Quarter	Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — GRANITESHARES ETF TR (COMB)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for COMB?

Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row: For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their COMB positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.

What is the institutional breadth score for COMB?

More sellers than buyers — 48% buying: Last quarter: 16 funds reduced or exited vs 15 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.

What is the fund quality score for COMB holders?

Smaller funds dominant — 7% AUM from top-100: 4 of 28 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 7% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.

How long have hedge funds held COMB?

61% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 17 out of 28 hedge funds have held COMB for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Market Cap	--
Enterprise Value	--
Trailing P/E	--
Forward P/E	--
PEG Ratio (5yr expected)	--
Price/Sales (ttm)	--
Price/Book (mrq)	--
Enterprise Value/Revenue	--
Enterprise Value/EBITDA	--
Beta (5Y Monthly)	--
Short Ratio (Days to Cover)	--
Short % of Float	--

Profit Margin	--
Return on Assets (ttm)	--
Return on Equity (ttm)	--

Revenue (ttm)	--
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm)	--
Diluted EPS (ttm)	--
Total Cash (mrq)	--
Total Debt/Equity (mrq)	--
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm)	--

GRANITESHARES ETF TR (COMB)

Smart Money Signals — COMB

Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row

Below peak — only 55% of 3.0Y high

Outflows — 10% fewer funds vs a year ago

More sellers than buyers — 48% buying

Steady new buyers — ~1 new funds per quarter

61% of holders stayed for 2+ years

Saturation — most institutions already know this story

Deep conviction — 64% of holders stayed 2+ years

Smaller funds dominant — 7% AUM from top-100

Hedge Fund Ownership: COMB

Market Analysis: COMB

Analyst Price Targets

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Company Profile: COMB

Hedge Fund Positioning: COMB

Statistics: COMB

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Financial Highlights

Institutional Holders (2026 Q1)

Frequently Asked Questions — GRANITESHARES ETF TR (COMB)

Welcome to 13Foresight!