Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Canadian Imperial Bank of Co (CM)

554 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in CM. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↑ +50
Streak
8Q ▲
Buyers last Q
57%

Smart Money Signals — CM

Based on 571 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 8 quarters in a row

last 6Q
For 8 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added CM than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️

At the ownership peak (100% of max)

100% of all-time peak
571 hedge funds hold CM right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
🚀

Fast accumulation — +21% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
+100 new funds entered over the past year (+21% YoY). That's a rapid rush of institutional money. Fast accumulation often signals a major thesis — but it also means the stock could fall quickly if that thesis breaks.
🟡

Slight buying edge — 57% buying

303 buying227 selling
Last quarter: 303 funds bought or added vs 227 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.
📈

More new buyers each quarter (+29 vs last Q)

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening a new CM position: 55 → 88 → 67 → 96. A growing influx of new institutional buyers means the asset is still gathering momentum — the consensus hasn't fully saturated yet.
🔒

58% of holders stayed for 2+ years

■ 58% conviction (2yr+) ■ 20% medium ■ 23% new
329 out of 571 hedge funds have held CM for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💰

Price up while funds trimmed (+21% value, -1% shares)

Value
+21%
Shares
-1%
Last quarter: total value of institutional CM holdings rose +21% even though funds reduced share count by 1%. The stock price increased enough to offset the selling. Institutions are quietly trimming into price strength — watch for rotation.
📈

Growing discovery — still being found

66 → 55 → 88 → 67 → 96 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 55 → 88 → 67 → 96. A growing number of institutions are discovering CM each quarter. The narrative is still spreading — leaving room for ongoing capital accumulation.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 63% veterans vs 25% newcomers

■ 63% veterans ■ 12% 1-2yr ■ 25% new
Entry-cohort mix of 607 holders: 382 (63%) are 2+ year veterans, 74 entered 1–2 years ago, and 151 (25%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆

Elite ownership — 55% AUM from top-100 funds

55% from top-100 AUM funds
56 of 561 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 55% of total institutional value in CM. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
3.8
out of 10
Low Exit Risk
Exit risk score 3.8/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — CM

In 2026 Q2, 303 hedge funds were net buyers of CM (96 opened a new position, 207 added to an existing one), while 227 reduced or exited (181 trimmed, 46 sold completely) — a 57% buyer ratio, indicating a slight buying edge. This marks 8 consecutive quarters of net institutional buying — a persistent conviction signal. 55% of total institutional value in CM is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting elite-tier ownership quality. Net fund flow last quarter: +50 funds (more new holders than closures). Total institutional holders: 571.

Hedge Fund Ownership: CM

How many hedge funds hold CM — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of CM vs. share price

Market Analysis: CM

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: CM

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

22 top-rated funds 12 high-conviction
Consensus
5.9
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
5.5
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: CM
554 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in CM. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q2) Prior (2026 Q1) Change
Funds Holding 554 521 6.33%
13F Shares 438M 444M -1.24%
Total Value $49.52B $40.79B 21.39%
New Positions 93 67 +26
Increased Positions 202 184 +18
Closed Positions 50 54 -4
Reduced Positions 171 166 +5
Total Calls 24 17 41.18%
Total Puts 22 17 29.41%
PUT/CALL Ratio 0.92 1.0 Neutral

Statistics: CM

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

554 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in CM. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 CM holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Canerector Inc 10.49% 200,000 $23.0M
2 Murchinson Ltd. 6.54% 412,500 $47.4M
3 Flat Footed LLC 5.12% 582,500 $67.0M
4 Murchinson Ltd. 4.80% 302,500 $34.8M
5 SIG North Trading, ULC 4.37% 2,060,500 $237.0M
6 Cardinal Capital Management, Inc. 4.26% 1,533,246 $176.2M
7 Mufg Securities (canada), LTD. 4.03% 1,301,918 $149.7M
8 Value Partners Investments Inc. 3.81% 474,658 $54.6M
9 Triasima Portfolio Management inc. 3.79% 243,652 $28.0M
10 Guardian Partners Inc. 3.52% 338,582 $39.0M
11 Lorne Steinberg Wealth Management Inc. 3.47% 146,592 $16.9M
12 Barometer Capital Management INC. 3.22% 70,960 $11.6M
13 Hillsdale Investment Management Inc. 2.90% 1,106,970 $127.3M
14 SIG North Trading, ULC 2.88% 1,357,600 $156.1M
15 PARK CIRCLE Co 2.75% 28,000 $3.2M
16 Aviso Financial Inc. 2.70% 675,677 $77.8M
17 TD Waterhouse Canada Inc. 2.59% 8,475,369 $985.2M
18 Letko, Brosseau & Associates Inc 2.51% 1,475,569 $169.9M
19 Guardian Capital LP 2.20% 786,905 $90.6M
20 K.J. Harrison & Partners Inc 2.16% 132,653 $15.2M
21 Cibc World Market INC. 2.15% 11,569,311 $1.34B
22 Cidel Asset Management Inc 2.11% 380,736 $43.8M
23 TD Asset Management Inc 1.99% 19,907,518 $2.29B
24 Bank of Nova Scotia 1.96% 11,268,708 $1.30B
25 Scotia Capital INC. 1.94% 4,517,328 $518.5M
Investor Ownership
History 		% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Canadian Imperial Bank of Co (CM)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for CM?

Buying streak — 8 quarters in a row: For 8 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added CM than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for CM?

Slight buying edge — 57% buying: Last quarter: 303 funds bought or added vs 227 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.

What is the fund quality score for CM holders?

Elite ownership — 55% AUM from top-100 funds: 56 of 561 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 55% of total institutional value in CM. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held CM?

58% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 329 out of 571 hedge funds have held CM for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →