Based on 4 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly
📈
Buying streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds added CINGW than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🔻
Below peak — only 44% of 3.0Y high
44% of all-time peak
Only 4 funds hold CINGW today versus a peak of 9 funds at 2024 Q2 — just 44% of the maximum. Low institutional ownership can mean the stock is out of favor, but it also means there's a large pool of potential buyers if sentiment turns.
📉
Outflows — 20% fewer funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
1 fewer hedge funds hold CINGW compared to a year ago (-20% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🟡
Slight buying edge — 50% buying
2 buying2 selling
Last quarter: 2 funds bought or added vs 2 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~2 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 0 → 2 → 0 → 2. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒
50% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 50% conviction (2yr+)
■ 25% medium
■ 25% new
2 out of 4 hedge funds have held CINGW for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~2 new funds/quarter
2 → 0 → 2 → 0 → 2 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 0 → 2 → 0 → 2. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Deep conviction — 50% of holders stayed 2+ years
■ 50% veterans
■ 25% 1-2yr
■ 25% new
Of 4 current holders: 2 (50%) have held for over 2 years without selling. These are not momentum buyers — they have lived through drawdowns and stayed. A large veteran base acts as a stabilizing force during selloffs.
🏆
Elite ownership — 40% AUM from top-100 funds
40% from top-100 AUM funds
2 of 4 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 40% of total institutional value in CINGW. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
Exit risk score 1.0/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.