Based on 6 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly
📈
Buying streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds added CIHKY than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
📊
High ownership — 86% of 3.0Y peak
86% of all-time peak
6 funds currently hold this stock — 86% of the 3.0-year high of 7 funds (reached 2024 Q4). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
📉
Outflows — 14% fewer funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
1 fewer hedge funds hold CIHKY compared to a year ago (-14% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🟠
More sellers than buyers — 40% buying
2 buying3 selling
Last quarter: 3 funds reduced or exited vs 2 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~1 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 0 → 0 → 0 → 1. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒
50% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 50% conviction (2yr+)
■ 33% medium
■ 17% new
3 out of 6 hedge funds have held CIHKY for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~1 new funds/quarter
0 → 0 → 0 → 0 → 1 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 0 → 0 → 0 → 1. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
📊
Mixed cohorts — 33% veterans, 17% new entrants
■ 33% veterans
■ 50% 1-2yr
■ 17% new
Of 6 current holders: 2 (33%) held 2+ years, 3 held 1–2 years, 1 (17%) entered in the past year. Balanced distribution — some institutional memory, some recent momentum buyers.
✅
Strong quality — 29% AUM from major funds
29% from top-100 AUM funds
2 of 6 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, accounting for 29% of total institutional value held. A meaningful share of the ownership value comes from the most well-resourced institutions.
Exit risk score 3.2/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.