Based on 10 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly
➡️
No change last quarter
The number of hedge funds holding this stock didn't change last quarter. Neither a buying nor selling signal on its own — watch the next quarter for direction.
🔻
Below peak — only 67% of 3.0Y high
67% of all-time peak
Only 10 funds hold CETY today versus a peak of 15 funds at 2024 Q4 — just 67% of the maximum. Low institutional ownership can mean the stock is out of favor, but it also means there's a large pool of potential buyers if sentiment turns.
📉
Outflows — 17% fewer funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
2 fewer hedge funds hold CETY compared to a year ago (-17% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🟡
Slight buying edge — 55% buying
6 buying5 selling
Last quarter: 6 funds bought or added vs 5 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~3 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 6 → 2 → 5 → 3. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
📌
Mixed — 30% long-term, 30% new
■ 30% conviction (2yr+)
■ 40% medium
■ 30% new
Of the 10 current holders: 3 (30%) held >2 years, 4 held 1–2 years, and 3 entered in the last year. A mixed base — the stock has long-term believers but also recent buyers who haven't been tested by a downturn yet.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~3 new funds/quarter
3 → 6 → 2 → 5 → 3 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 6 → 2 → 5 → 3. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 40% veterans vs 40% newcomers
■ 40% veterans
■ 20% 1-2yr
■ 40% new
Entry-cohort mix of 10 holders: 4 (40%) are 2+ year veterans, 2 entered 1–2 years ago, and 4 (40%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
✅
Strong quality — 27% AUM from major funds
27% from top-100 AUM funds
4 of 10 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, accounting for 27% of total institutional value held. A meaningful share of the ownership value comes from the most well-resourced institutions.
Exit risk score 2.1/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.