Based on 76 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly
📈
Buying streak — 6 quarters in a row
For 6 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added CBFV than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️
At the ownership peak (100% of max)
100% of all-time peak
76 hedge funds hold CBFV right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
🚀
Fast accumulation — +58% more funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
+28 new funds entered over the past year (+58% YoY). That's a rapid rush of institutional money. Fast accumulation often signals a major thesis — but it also means the stock could fall quickly if that thesis breaks.
🔴
Heavy selling pressure — only 38% buying
22 buying36 selling
Last quarter: 36 funds sold vs only 22 buyers. This is widespread institutional distribution — not a few funds rebalancing, but a broad exit. High conviction bearish signal.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~8 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 15 → 16 → 8 → 8. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒
58% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 58% conviction (2yr+)
■ 14% medium
■ 28% new
44 out of 76 hedge funds have held CBFV for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💎
Buying through price weakness — shares -1%, value -25%
Last quarter: funds added -1% more shares while total portfolio value only changed -25%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
⚠️
Saturation — most institutions already know this story
8 → 15 → 16 → 8 → 8 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 15 → 16 → 8 → 8. Far fewer institutions are entering now vs. a year ago. When the pool of potential new buyers shrinks this fast, future price support from institutional inflows weakens significantly.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 61% veterans vs 33% newcomers
■ 61% veterans
■ 7% 1-2yr
■ 33% new
Entry-cohort mix of 76 holders: 46 (61%) are 2+ year veterans, 5 entered 1–2 years ago, and 25 (33%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆
Elite ownership — 44% AUM from top-100 funds
44% from top-100 AUM funds
25 of 76 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 44% of total institutional value in CBFV. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
4.9
out of 10
Moderate Exit Risk
Exit risk score 4.9/10 — some crowding factors present, but no critical concentration. Watch ownership trend over the next 1–2 quarters for direction.