Based on 1 hedge funds · latest filing: 2025 Q4 · updated quarterly
📉
Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their CARK positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
🔻
Below peak — only 25% of 2.2Y high
25% of all-time peak
Only 1 funds hold CARK today versus a peak of 4 funds at 2025 Q3 — just 25% of the maximum. Low institutional ownership can mean the stock is out of favor, but it also means there's a large pool of potential buyers if sentiment turns.
〰️
Stable — ownership unchanged year-over-year
fund count last 6Q
The number of hedge funds holding CARK is almost the same as a year ago (+0 funds, +0% change). No significant rush to buy or sell — institutional backing is holding steady.
🔴
Heavy selling pressure — only 25% buying
1 buying3 selling
Last quarter: 3 funds sold vs only 1 buyers. This is widespread institutional distribution — not a few funds rebalancing, but a broad exit. High conviction bearish signal.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~0 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 1 → 0 → 2 → 0. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒
100% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 100% conviction (2yr+)
■ 0% medium
■ 0% new
1 out of 1 hedge funds have held CARK for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~0 new funds/quarter
0 → 1 → 0 → 2 → 0 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 1 → 0 → 2 → 0. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
📊
Mixed cohorts — 0% veterans, 0% new entrants
■ 0% veterans
■ 100% 1-2yr
■ 0% new
Of 1 current holders: 0 (0%) held 2+ years, 1 held 1–2 years, 0 (0%) entered in the past year. Balanced distribution — some institutional memory, some recent momentum buyers.
📋
Smaller funds dominant — 0% AUM from top-100
0% from top-100 AUM funds
0 of 1 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 0% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.
Exit risk score 2.2/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.