Based on 79 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly
📈
Buying streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds added BSET than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️
At the ownership peak (100% of max)
100% of all-time peak
79 hedge funds hold BSET right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
🚀
Fast accumulation — +55% more funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
+28 new funds entered over the past year (+55% YoY). That's a rapid rush of institutional money. Fast accumulation often signals a major thesis — but it also means the stock could fall quickly if that thesis breaks.
🟢
More buyers than sellers — 60% buying
41 buying27 selling
Last quarter: 41 funds were net buyers (12 opened a brand new position + 29 added to an existing one). Only 27 were sellers (18 trimmed + 9 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~12 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 22 → 15 → 10 → 12. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒
66% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 66% conviction (2yr+)
■ 13% medium
■ 22% new
52 out of 79 hedge funds have held BSET for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💎
Buying through price weakness — shares +1%, value -19%
Last quarter: funds added +1% more shares while total portfolio value only changed -19%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
⚠️
Saturation — most institutions already know this story
3 → 22 → 15 → 10 → 12 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 22 → 15 → 10 → 12. Far fewer institutions are entering now vs. a year ago. When the pool of potential new buyers shrinks this fast, future price support from institutional inflows weakens significantly.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 70% veterans vs 27% newcomers
■ 70% veterans
■ 4% 1-2yr
■ 27% new
Entry-cohort mix of 79 holders: 55 (70%) are 2+ year veterans, 3 entered 1–2 years ago, and 21 (27%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
✅
Strong quality — 32% AUM from major funds
32% from top-100 AUM funds
26 of 79 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, accounting for 32% of total institutional value held. A meaningful share of the ownership value comes from the most well-resourced institutions.
Exit risk score 3.9/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.